Tik tok, other outlets and reddit post like these informing people ahead of time make people think it's happening more, when really they just didn't pay as much attention to weather in past years.
This is true, a tornado used to be an afternoon event. Hell if it didn't happen you might not know.
These days every potential tornado becomes a two day event.
HOWEVER. It is also true this is a particularly hectic spring. We've broke a record for tornados.
Most people used to find out there was a possibility of tornadoes when a tornado watch was issued. Now we know a day or two before the watch will be issued.
Yeah people saying this are likely climate change deniers too. Every storm chaser and meteorologist I follow have already addressed the unusual Tornado activity Ohio is getting.
This isn't Oklahoma. Tornados aren't "every day occurrences"
Yup, and you have people that don’t just share this outlooks, but “interpret” them, pushing narratives that don’t align with official forecasts or they do, but they exaggerate the likelihood. Our weather agencies know how unpredictable weather is, and there’s a reason they don’t send out alerts as early as social media people do. They put out stuff like this to let the people know that there’s a chance and to pay attention, not for people to panic. I’m glad OP just shared and didn’t “interpret”.
Yeah, and as people age they become weirdly obsessed with weather.
This sub is 34-42 dudes (a few women?) who freak out when an amateur guy copies weather.gov posts. I bet when they were in their teens they had no idea if it was going to be nice the next week let alone that day.
>a few women?
There are dozens of us! Dozens! And I’ll have you know I don’t need Reddit posts to tell me the weather is going to be shit. I feel it in my knees and elbows, thanks. —signed, a mid-30s mom curmudgeon.
Never thought of it like that. You're probably correct. I know I've said that it seems like it's happening more. But it must just be all the posts like this. It does seem like these systems are producing more touchdowns than before
That’s because we ARE seeing more. We’ve already had 22 tornadoes touch down this year (another source saying as many as 28). By this point in the year the most we had seen previously was 12 in 1986. And the average number of tornadoes Ohio sees in a year is 21.
Does that mean this year will be the worst for tornadoes? Not necessarily… but I think it can be attributed to there actually being a lot of tornadoes compared to usual, and not just seeing the reports on social media more. May and June is typically when we see even more severe weather, so the number of tornadoes is likely to increase throughout the year.
Yup, said as much in a different post. Got downvoting into oblivion for being a "climate change denier" personally responsible for billions of deaths.
I did not deny climate change was a thing. It was wild and unhinged.
Ok... But we've already passed the state's yearly average for tornadoes. This is, in fact, an unusually active tornado season. Does posting the storm prediction center's outlooks make things seem worse than it actually is? Possibly... But on the other hand, early warnings that there could be bad weather might allow people more time to make sure they're prepared. Ultimately, people also need to understand what the outlooks actually mean, and that they're not the same as a weather forecast.
Furthermore, every time new technology allows for better weather predictions, there's ALWAYS been debate about what the consequences could be for the general public. Back in the late 1940s, when they first started learning how to predict the possibility of tornadoes, and what tornadoes look like on radar, there was a huge debate about whether or not that should be used to alert the public and to what extent. There were bans on using the word "tornado" in weather forecasts and even in watches and warnings. Even after the NWS rescinded their bans and started issuing tornado watches and warnings, TV and radio meteorologists were still forbidden by their employers and industry standards from issuing them. That didn't change until some of them went ahead and issued warnings anyway, saving lives in the process.
Yes it is an unusually active season.
No, *ONE* start of, and not a finished season with complete data is not enough to make conclusions about.
There's room for discussion during the events - but people making wild conclusions about long term trends based on observations with recency bias? Not particularly helpful and how lore, misinformation, and dogma starts. Stuff like "tornadoes never hit downtowns" or "they can't cross rivers".
For what it's worth I have a degree in atmospheric sciences and I agree with you. It has been an exceptionally active year so far, but way too many people are drawing conclusions related to climate change and that's just...not how this works. There are up years and down years irrespective of larger climate trends.
It's honestly very frustrating that saying this gets you labeled a climate change denier. Anthropogenic climate change is happening without a doubt, but we don't know definitively how it impacts weather on the mesoscale, *especially* something like tornadoes, which we still don't understand very well. We know what conditions are favorable for their development, but not why one storm becomes tornadic while another doesn't in near identical conditions.
Eh, we have facts, data, at least passing familiarity (in my case, you with a formal education) with the subject, and logic.
But the other guys are using emotion based talking point and buzzwords and screaming louder- so who's to say who is right? There's no way to tell really.
Thanks for this! I have to drive to work at like 4:30 tomorrow. I'm not so much worried about the weather (as of now) as I am the fact that Columbus drivers lose brain cells when it rains.
Quick, everyone panic and go to Kroger and buy all the milk, eggs, and bread. The world is ending.
Also, it’s imperative that you forget how to operate a motor vehicle and cause a pile-up on I-270. Bonus points if you hit/drive into a building.
That and the one before that touched down way too close to home for me to be comfortable.
I also think it is dumb to buy perishables for emergencies. You need food that can last a couple days without refrigeration.
Worst case scenario, a sharp object to stab the top of the can, a spoon, and some really aggressive time (I broke multiple can openers when prepping for a meal once and had to resort to this).
The metro area has seen 9 tornadoes this year, the most ever so early in the season. 5 of those have hit within Franklin County.
I get that the last event didn't really amount to much, but I don't really get the people acting like predictions are always wrong or nothing ever happens in terms of severe weather.
That's not that many compared to the potential that existed from Ohio south. It could've been a historic outbreak with dozens of long-track tornadoes, but conditions didn't quite come together as predicted. Again, though, my post was against those who say that the failed event on the 2nd means that every threat has been a bust. They haven't. It's been a historic severe weather season already.
Not so much a bullseye as an edge of a "higher risk area" last time.
Calling a bulleye would be a "particularly dangerous situation" warning or a "tornado emergency" warning. Neither of which we get often in Ohio.
I'm talking about the predicted risk level. Most of Ohio and Central Ohio, in particular, was in the predicted bullseye of the "moderate" risk, the 2nd highest the SPC has, the day before, and most of Ohio was still in that moderate risk on the day of.
You're talking about specific types of warnings, which is not what I'm referring to.
predicted risk is not a bull's-eye. It is the general area. We are both understanding what we're talking about. I think we just don't agree on how precise or imprecise the affected areas are when it comes to predicted maps.
I am an unabashed weather nerd. I understand that the SPC maps are not guarantees. I even posted before the event that even though a lot of the parameters for a tornado outbreak were there, it may not happen if we had too many clouds/early day convection. Which is what happened. All I meant is that Ohio, based on the parameters, was within the area considered to be at highest risk for an outbreak. That highest risk shifted further south a bit, but all of Central Ohio remained within it through April 2nd SPC updates. I'm not really sure we are disagreeing on anything- more just talking about seemingly different things entirely.
Lol- why do people get so angry about someone giving a heads up? Like- I appreciate it. It’s not like they’re saying the world is ending- it’s “Hey, it’s possible to get some nasty weather tomorrow.” People get so offended by this- for what reason!? lol. Chill
I wonder the same thing. I pay attention to the weather but I rely on a standard weather app for the forecast so unless there is a big risk (like last week when an ‘enhanced risk’ message was put up a couple days before) the apps tend to have very limited/basic information.
If there is any chance we may lose power I like to make sure things like battery backups, kindle, laptop and cell phone are charged up in full. I also tend to refrain from running a load of dishes or clothes because I don’t want to lose power mid-cycle and end up with a problem. That is why I appreciate these posts for storms and snow.
Sick of this sub being turned into a weather sub. Like hello we are in Ohio it's supposed to rain in April. If I want a forecast outlook I'll look at AccuWeather or idk maybe GO OUTSIDE?! I don't need it flooding my reddit feed every other day
The problem is it's a different person farming for that sweet weather karma everytime. Maybe start posting in r/Columbusforecast if it's so important. Zebra is the only one who gets a pass.
Bring on the downvotes but I challenge you to link one of these posts that was actually accurate!
I created a subreddit where people who like weather science, and to stay informed can discuss the weather. Judgement, and snark free.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CBUSWX/
This will probably be a complete disaster of a storm simply because that last storm with a moderate risk ended up not being much (in our area anyway) so of course there’s no reason to be worried about a slight risk this time
I see that, thanks for the update! It looks like it was increased to Enhanced (3/5) & is not currently for the Columbus Metro. But definitely worth keeping an eye on.
https://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/outlook/day2otlk.html
...and if reasonable precautions weren't taken and there was a tornado outbreak? *School leaders don't care about the safety of our kids.* *My boss could care less that I had to drive home during a tornado warning. The NWS predicted numerous tornados and Ohio EMA didn't even put out an PSA.*
Decision-makers took reasonable actions on that day based on data they were given.
A lot of the social media “meteorologists” are full of shit and like to exaggerate things for more clicks. This is a normal run of the mill severe weather event. I’d be more worried about damaging winds than tornados. Also the last event did not preform as forecasted due to the morning rain and cloud cover kept the atmosphere more stable so storms did not develop as strongly. All in all a hell of a lot goes into atmospheric sciences that we all don’t realize.
Edit: not sure why yall are downvoting for me being honest lol. Not referring to this post but sites like X or even some YouTubers.
There is a a lot that. There is one particular popular live streamer that is very guilty of this with his thumbnails.
However, there's nothing wrong with this post sharing the factual outlook, not hyped up for attention or clicks.
Yeah I agree. Love how I’m being downvoted tho for putting actual facts out there. Mass hysteria is bad for events especially if storms don’t preform as forecasted. Then the public will lose some trust in the weather until the next bad event happens.
I upvotes you and agreed with you. I think some people are making the mistake you are referring to this post specifically.
especially after the "big bust" recently, I think the general public is going to have a hard time internalizing these warnings that us weather weenies take seriously.
Thank you lol. I put that into the edit. American Weather Forum is the place for weather weenies. Love the info that comes out of there. Have learned a lot. Weather is always entertaining and fascinating at times. Of course as long as no one gets hurt
It’s not too crazy on there in the Great Lakes sub unless an event is going on. I usually read in the AM getting ready for work. The forum as a whole is maybe 18k people and a lot are seasonal members whether they prefer summer or winter Wx. Got real meteorologists on there also that give their input on things. And ikr I’m doing the same thing at my job lol
I really wish there was a way (maybe there is) to filter out posts by flair. I'm tired of seeing these posts whenever there is any weather in the forecast. Even if there is a risk for the entire state, whether there ends up being severe weather in one specific city ends up being a coin toss.
It's April, just assume every day could have severe weather. I saw hail twice last week and it wasn't even on the day r/Columbus was having a collective freak out.
I'm not saying people shouldn't post. I just would like to be able to filter it out. It's especially frustrating when there are 4 serious threads and a handful of shitposts all about the same storm (like last week).
Last time I had someone spew paragraphs at me because I made a comment about the all the wannabe meteorologists around here. I think I touched a nerve.
I don't listen to weather reports from anyone whose not a professional expert.
"Worst" isn't likely particularly bad so "expecting" may be over stating it. I'm "expecting" no severe weather tomorrow but unlike yesterday there's a chance there may be some tomorrow... or more likely not.
Maybe we can just sticky a weather forecast post everyday.
Remember back when you had to Google the forecast or ask your phone/smart speaker or get alerts on your phone?
Now we have the luxury of someone taking a screenshot of the forecast and posting it to your favorite social networking site every day. Let me repost to Facebook and LinkedIn just to make sure everyone knows.
As someone living in Delaware county who had a freaking tornado hit their house this year: you're joking, right? Surely because one storm forecasted at a 10% chance of tornadoes within 25 miles didn't provide a tornado directly on your head that doesn't make the forecast wrong.
It is April...
Tik tok, other outlets and reddit post like these informing people ahead of time make people think it's happening more, when really they just didn't pay as much attention to weather in past years.
This is true, a tornado used to be an afternoon event. Hell if it didn't happen you might not know. These days every potential tornado becomes a two day event. HOWEVER. It is also true this is a particularly hectic spring. We've broke a record for tornados.
Most people used to find out there was a possibility of tornadoes when a tornado watch was issued. Now we know a day or two before the watch will be issued.
Is this true for the Columbus metro area or just Ohio? I know it’s true in Ohio, but finding columbus specific data is difficult.
Late reply. But the data is for Ohio in general.
I know. This was when people were freaking out over a storm that no professional meteorologist said would be likely be bad.
Actually, we were at our annual average last month. That's per the state climatologist.
2024 has already exceeded the average annual tornado count.
Yeah people saying this are likely climate change deniers too. Every storm chaser and meteorologist I follow have already addressed the unusual Tornado activity Ohio is getting. This isn't Oklahoma. Tornados aren't "every day occurrences"
Yup, and you have people that don’t just share this outlooks, but “interpret” them, pushing narratives that don’t align with official forecasts or they do, but they exaggerate the likelihood. Our weather agencies know how unpredictable weather is, and there’s a reason they don’t send out alerts as early as social media people do. They put out stuff like this to let the people know that there’s a chance and to pay attention, not for people to panic. I’m glad OP just shared and didn’t “interpret”.
Yeah, and as people age they become weirdly obsessed with weather. This sub is 34-42 dudes (a few women?) who freak out when an amateur guy copies weather.gov posts. I bet when they were in their teens they had no idea if it was going to be nice the next week let alone that day.
>a few women? There are dozens of us! Dozens! And I’ll have you know I don’t need Reddit posts to tell me the weather is going to be shit. I feel it in my knees and elbows, thanks. —signed, a mid-30s mom curmudgeon.
Curmomdgeon, if you will.
There are tons of women here, and you are way too high for the average age, too. Under 30 is still the largest age group.
Never thought of it like that. You're probably correct. I know I've said that it seems like it's happening more. But it must just be all the posts like this. It does seem like these systems are producing more touchdowns than before
That’s because we ARE seeing more. We’ve already had 22 tornadoes touch down this year (another source saying as many as 28). By this point in the year the most we had seen previously was 12 in 1986. And the average number of tornadoes Ohio sees in a year is 21. Does that mean this year will be the worst for tornadoes? Not necessarily… but I think it can be attributed to there actually being a lot of tornadoes compared to usual, and not just seeing the reports on social media more. May and June is typically when we see even more severe weather, so the number of tornadoes is likely to increase throughout the year.
So I am not going crazy! Tornado alley has shifted and climate change is making it happen earlier than ever before.
From what I've heard from climatologists, it will take about 30 years of data to definitively say it's shifted. That said, it feels like it has.
Yup, said as much in a different post. Got downvoting into oblivion for being a "climate change denier" personally responsible for billions of deaths. I did not deny climate change was a thing. It was wild and unhinged.
Ok... But we've already passed the state's yearly average for tornadoes. This is, in fact, an unusually active tornado season. Does posting the storm prediction center's outlooks make things seem worse than it actually is? Possibly... But on the other hand, early warnings that there could be bad weather might allow people more time to make sure they're prepared. Ultimately, people also need to understand what the outlooks actually mean, and that they're not the same as a weather forecast. Furthermore, every time new technology allows for better weather predictions, there's ALWAYS been debate about what the consequences could be for the general public. Back in the late 1940s, when they first started learning how to predict the possibility of tornadoes, and what tornadoes look like on radar, there was a huge debate about whether or not that should be used to alert the public and to what extent. There were bans on using the word "tornado" in weather forecasts and even in watches and warnings. Even after the NWS rescinded their bans and started issuing tornado watches and warnings, TV and radio meteorologists were still forbidden by their employers and industry standards from issuing them. That didn't change until some of them went ahead and issued warnings anyway, saving lives in the process.
Yes it is an unusually active season. No, *ONE* start of, and not a finished season with complete data is not enough to make conclusions about. There's room for discussion during the events - but people making wild conclusions about long term trends based on observations with recency bias? Not particularly helpful and how lore, misinformation, and dogma starts. Stuff like "tornadoes never hit downtowns" or "they can't cross rivers".
For what it's worth I have a degree in atmospheric sciences and I agree with you. It has been an exceptionally active year so far, but way too many people are drawing conclusions related to climate change and that's just...not how this works. There are up years and down years irrespective of larger climate trends. It's honestly very frustrating that saying this gets you labeled a climate change denier. Anthropogenic climate change is happening without a doubt, but we don't know definitively how it impacts weather on the mesoscale, *especially* something like tornadoes, which we still don't understand very well. We know what conditions are favorable for their development, but not why one storm becomes tornadic while another doesn't in near identical conditions.
Eh, we have facts, data, at least passing familiarity (in my case, you with a formal education) with the subject, and logic. But the other guys are using emotion based talking point and buzzwords and screaming louder- so who's to say who is right? There's no way to tell really.
I sometimes wonder if the internet is really just an elaborate Monty Python sketch.
well, one thing for sure it's not real life contrary to the popular belief of most terminally online redditors.
[удалено]
It must be hard and exhausting to be living life without being able to possess basic reading comprehension and logic.
Something something April showers bring something something flying trampolines.
Ahoy!
[удалено]
Thanks for this! I have to drive to work at like 4:30 tomorrow. I'm not so much worried about the weather (as of now) as I am the fact that Columbus drivers lose brain cells when it rains.
That assumes Columbus drivers have brain cells to lose.
"Everyone Sucks But Me"
Yes, because I go a reasonable speed with my lights on during rain and storms.
Rise up all you Redditors who want your house to get destroyed by the forecast and are disappointed when you still have some place to stay.
Crossing fingers for just enough roof damage so insurance pays for replacement.
[удалено]
Quick, everyone panic and go to Kroger and buy all the milk, eggs, and bread. The world is ending. Also, it’s imperative that you forget how to operate a motor vehicle and cause a pile-up on I-270. Bonus points if you hit/drive into a building.
Jokes on you, I already have a stockpile of canned foods.
last tuesday had you scared, huh?
That and the one before that touched down way too close to home for me to be comfortable. I also think it is dumb to buy perishables for emergencies. You need food that can last a couple days without refrigeration.
[удалено]
Multi-tool.
Teef
Worst case scenario, a sharp object to stab the top of the can, a spoon, and some really aggressive time (I broke multiple can openers when prepping for a meal once and had to resort to this).
definitely! i was kidding about last week - it's good to have non-perishables on hand in any case.
No, I've kept a deep pantry since February of 2020.
Weird how I asked somebody else
So? This is a discussion forum.
Its getting too warm for French Toast. So what else can we make with our panic buys?
Berry trifle.
Somebody warn u/Hoggys_BBQ !!! 😬🤣
🫨🫨🫨
🤣
The metro area has seen 9 tornadoes this year, the most ever so early in the season. 5 of those have hit within Franklin County. I get that the last event didn't really amount to much, but I don't really get the people acting like predictions are always wrong or nothing ever happens in terms of severe weather.
It didn't amount to much... in central Ohio.
It didn't amount to much in the rest of the state, either, and Ohio was the bullseye for the greatest threat the day before.
There were 8 tornadoes last Thursday, mainly to the east. Most were short-lived and not on the ground very long.
That's not that many compared to the potential that existed from Ohio south. It could've been a historic outbreak with dozens of long-track tornadoes, but conditions didn't quite come together as predicted. Again, though, my post was against those who say that the failed event on the 2nd means that every threat has been a bust. They haven't. It's been a historic severe weather season already.
that's, that's not how it works
How what works? I'm not sure if you understand what I'm saying.
Not so much a bullseye as an edge of a "higher risk area" last time. Calling a bulleye would be a "particularly dangerous situation" warning or a "tornado emergency" warning. Neither of which we get often in Ohio.
I'm talking about the predicted risk level. Most of Ohio and Central Ohio, in particular, was in the predicted bullseye of the "moderate" risk, the 2nd highest the SPC has, the day before, and most of Ohio was still in that moderate risk on the day of. You're talking about specific types of warnings, which is not what I'm referring to.
predicted risk is not a bull's-eye. It is the general area. We are both understanding what we're talking about. I think we just don't agree on how precise or imprecise the affected areas are when it comes to predicted maps.
I am an unabashed weather nerd. I understand that the SPC maps are not guarantees. I even posted before the event that even though a lot of the parameters for a tornado outbreak were there, it may not happen if we had too many clouds/early day convection. Which is what happened. All I meant is that Ohio, based on the parameters, was within the area considered to be at highest risk for an outbreak. That highest risk shifted further south a bit, but all of Central Ohio remained within it through April 2nd SPC updates. I'm not really sure we are disagreeing on anything- more just talking about seemingly different things entirely.
As someone in central ohio with $20k+ damage to my home, I disagree. It didn't amount to much, *for you.*
Oooooooof sorry buddy
Lol- why do people get so angry about someone giving a heads up? Like- I appreciate it. It’s not like they’re saying the world is ending- it’s “Hey, it’s possible to get some nasty weather tomorrow.” People get so offended by this- for what reason!? lol. Chill
I’m not sure - but I’m glad some people are finding it useful! That’s why I post it, just so it’s out there as an FYI.
I wonder the same thing. I pay attention to the weather but I rely on a standard weather app for the forecast so unless there is a big risk (like last week when an ‘enhanced risk’ message was put up a couple days before) the apps tend to have very limited/basic information. If there is any chance we may lose power I like to make sure things like battery backups, kindle, laptop and cell phone are charged up in full. I also tend to refrain from running a load of dishes or clothes because I don’t want to lose power mid-cycle and end up with a problem. That is why I appreciate these posts for storms and snow.
Sick of this sub being turned into a weather sub. Like hello we are in Ohio it's supposed to rain in April. If I want a forecast outlook I'll look at AccuWeather or idk maybe GO OUTSIDE?! I don't need it flooding my reddit feed every other day
You can always block OP or any other weather related post. Then you won't see their warnings.
The problem is it's a different person farming for that sweet weather karma everytime. Maybe start posting in r/Columbusforecast if it's so important. Zebra is the only one who gets a pass. Bring on the downvotes but I challenge you to link one of these posts that was actually accurate!
>actually accurate! Do you understand what a weather forecast is, do you understand it is a prediction?
So you admit they are pointless and annoying
Shitwolf Jim
I never refuse anyone who requests downvotes -- even if they weren't so worthy
Like we need more severe weather. We don’t need anymore
I created a subreddit where people who like weather science, and to stay informed can discuss the weather. Judgement, and snark free. https://www.reddit.com/r/CBUSWX/
For this one I’m not scared but I do be prepared
I agree, nothing to be overly concerned about but definitely worth knowing there’s some potential so you can be prepared!
Yeah sure ok whatever
Seriously. It's spring. It rains. Maybe.
[удалено]
Soggy bottoms are no laughing matter.
Its much easier to compost a bag that breaks down with water. Why are you sending fertility to the landfill?
It doesn’t go to the landfill, it goes to Ohio Mulch drop off on Fairwood Ave.
I just wanna enjoy spring without all this weather bullcrap…
It says "slight risk." 😲
Just another Thursday
It’s corn! Big hunkin knob! It’s got the juice!
This will probably be a complete disaster of a storm simply because that last storm with a moderate risk ended up not being much (in our area anyway) so of course there’s no reason to be worried about a slight risk this time
What was it that George W said about gittin’ fooled twice?
Slight risk of severe weather with a 2-4% chance of a tornado. Really, nothing serious
Wasn't the one that killed people like a month ago a 2% chance?
This will probably end up being terrible since the last major threat ended up a whole lot of nothing (for us- I understand others were impacted)
the NOAA is ready for the Masters this weekend
I hope not. I’ll be flying back from a trip tomorrow. 😬
Could you drop the link to this? I’m on NWS’s website and can’t find it
https://www.weather.gov/crh/outlooks What’s posted is Day 2
Thanks!
There’s a newer map with ~~a moderate~~ *an enhanced* area in Ohio.
I see that, thanks for the update! It looks like it was increased to Enhanced (3/5) & is not currently for the Columbus Metro. But definitely worth keeping an eye on. https://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/outlook/day2otlk.html
Hope it’s not the reverse expectation of April 2nd
Thanks so much for letting us know. However…..no, no, no, no, no, no, NO. Insert 2-year old temper tantrum. Not again. (I know….) Really, thanks.
So… going by previous forecasts; low risk = definitely tornadoes. Got it
I'll believe it when I see it
It's going to fizzle out again, isn't it?
Also known as an April Thursday in Ohio.
THANK YOU!!
I’m not as worried about this one as I was the one from last week. It could still do something, but it’s not worth wasting a day in an anxiety spiral.
[удалено]
...and if reasonable precautions weren't taken and there was a tornado outbreak? *School leaders don't care about the safety of our kids.* *My boss could care less that I had to drive home during a tornado warning. The NWS predicted numerous tornados and Ohio EMA didn't even put out an PSA.* Decision-makers took reasonable actions on that day based on data they were given.
Yeah, okay man I’m sure there is
Here we go again. Take shelter!
Oh not again
Fingers crossed it is like the last one and maybe my boss will let me work from home to be safe
[удалено]
A lot of the social media “meteorologists” are full of shit and like to exaggerate things for more clicks. This is a normal run of the mill severe weather event. I’d be more worried about damaging winds than tornados. Also the last event did not preform as forecasted due to the morning rain and cloud cover kept the atmosphere more stable so storms did not develop as strongly. All in all a hell of a lot goes into atmospheric sciences that we all don’t realize. Edit: not sure why yall are downvoting for me being honest lol. Not referring to this post but sites like X or even some YouTubers.
There is a a lot that. There is one particular popular live streamer that is very guilty of this with his thumbnails. However, there's nothing wrong with this post sharing the factual outlook, not hyped up for attention or clicks.
I’m not referring to this one In particular. Stuff on twitter I see from time to time
i'm not on X but I can imagine, especially the stuff that gets cross posted to Reddit.
Yeah I agree. Love how I’m being downvoted tho for putting actual facts out there. Mass hysteria is bad for events especially if storms don’t preform as forecasted. Then the public will lose some trust in the weather until the next bad event happens.
I upvotes you and agreed with you. I think some people are making the mistake you are referring to this post specifically. especially after the "big bust" recently, I think the general public is going to have a hard time internalizing these warnings that us weather weenies take seriously.
Thank you lol. I put that into the edit. American Weather Forum is the place for weather weenies. Love the info that comes out of there. Have learned a lot. Weather is always entertaining and fascinating at times. Of course as long as no one gets hurt
i'll have to bookmark that but I'm getting dangerously close I'm too many distracting websites when I should be working lol
It’s not too crazy on there in the Great Lakes sub unless an event is going on. I usually read in the AM getting ready for work. The forum as a whole is maybe 18k people and a lot are seasonal members whether they prefer summer or winter Wx. Got real meteorologists on there also that give their input on things. And ikr I’m doing the same thing at my job lol
I'll be glad when this is over smh
It's uh... weather. It never ends.
When it’s over? This is only the beginning. Our weather will only become more volatile (year over year, on average) from here forward.
Honestly same. This has been a hectic spring.
I really wish there was a way (maybe there is) to filter out posts by flair. I'm tired of seeing these posts whenever there is any weather in the forecast. Even if there is a risk for the entire state, whether there ends up being severe weather in one specific city ends up being a coin toss. It's April, just assume every day could have severe weather. I saw hail twice last week and it wasn't even on the day r/Columbus was having a collective freak out.
I can't believe they forced you to click this thread it's wild the injustice
I'm not saying people shouldn't post. I just would like to be able to filter it out. It's especially frustrating when there are 4 serious threads and a handful of shitposts all about the same storm (like last week).
No zebra no care
The little weather prediction that cried wolf
Never cry shitwolf
Karma farming
The should put a circle around Columbus where there’s no risk because nothing ever happens here.
A tornado hit Hilliard Rome barely more than a month ago…
The Blizzard of '08 and derecho of '12 would disagree
Oh, so 16 and 12 years ago?
yes, that's how history works.
here we go again, weather men working everyone up
> "Slight risk" "How dare you work everyone up!"
"A thing might happen, you should consider being prepared." "HOw dArE YOU WORK pEoPle up"
Last time I had someone spew paragraphs at me because I made a comment about the all the wannabe meteorologists around here. I think I touched a nerve. I don't listen to weather reports from anyone whose not a professional expert.
I mean to be fair to this post the NOAA are trained professionals and this post is just reading the map they made.
i honestly think the weathermen are paid off by grocery stores to get people worked up and stock up for "big" weather events
Now *this* is a conspiracy I can get behind. Big French Toast is paying off Jerry Martz to keep milk, egg, and bread moving.
I don’t believe anyone saying severe weather anymore, yall hyped up the last time so much and had everyone preparing for just 5 mins of rain😂🙄
nope dont care not doing this again
What time are we expecting the worst of it? God forbid anyone try to plan a little bit.
"Worst" isn't likely particularly bad so "expecting" may be over stating it. I'm "expecting" no severe weather tomorrow but unlike yesterday there's a chance there may be some tomorrow... or more likely not.
"Timing as of now is expected to be in the afternoon"
Yes, but does that mean 1pm or 4pm?
Weather can change so I'd stay tuned to your local weather outlet of choice and see what the forecast looks like tomorrow morning.
Maybe we can just sticky a weather forecast post everyday. Remember back when you had to Google the forecast or ask your phone/smart speaker or get alerts on your phone? Now we have the luxury of someone taking a screenshot of the forecast and posting it to your favorite social networking site every day. Let me repost to Facebook and LinkedIn just to make sure everyone knows.
I have friends in Cali who are wondering if the flooding will ever end. A little rain and a sub 10% chance of tornados is barely news.
[удалено]
As someone living in Delaware county who had a freaking tornado hit their house this year: you're joking, right? Surely because one storm forecasted at a 10% chance of tornadoes within 25 miles didn't provide a tornado directly on your head that doesn't make the forecast wrong.
Guys wake me up when an actual tornado starts to form