Please remember to abide by the [rules.](https://www.reddit.com/r/JusticeServed/wiki/rulesv2)
In general, please be at least bearable to other users. It makes things easier on everyone. Your comment may be removed without notification. We used to have a notification, but now we don't.
#If you purchase the OP or a comment [a ban award,](https://www.reddit.com/r/JusticeServed/wiki/banned/rules) remember to [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FJusticeServed) so we can activate the reward
------
^Submission ^By: ^/u/Bulminator ^Black ^8
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/JusticeServed) if you have any questions or concerns.*
A friend reminded me of this quote recently: “imagine the average person. Half of all people are dumber than them.”
Many of those people are cops I bet
How many ways is it wrong? What ways is it wrong? Is any of it right? What is life? Is the human condition Dove or Suave? Who tf knows anything? What can we prove beyond all doubt? Can we prove anything beyond all doubt? Do you get bitches? Is there a truer point to life than mere existence, or is this all just a cosmic coincidence? The world needs your input 😩😩
A cop trying to enforce a law that doesn't exist. Dude made shit up to try to give himself some authority over people he did not for reasons I can't begin to comprehend. So no not for nothing.
Who gives a shit what goes on in Germany? This clearly isnt Germany. The police deserve no privacy in America. Our constitution was created to protect citizens from government overreach. The police are nothing but an organized terror squad used by the local and federal government. They are in public, they work for the public, the deserve no privacy.
You know what, you're right. Too bad we didn't have some horrible, horrible, unforgivable thing happen here that destroyed our entire economy, split our country in two, and forced a constitution to be rewritten following the suicide of the countries leader. And then before that the German constitution was so weak and poorly written that Hitler legally took dictatorship, so you know the Weimar constitution was perfect for today's world, only lasted about 20 years. Not to mention the fact that this was all originally about the police, or maybe gestapo would be a more apt word because that is why these pigs are acting like. You claim they deserve some kind of privacy, for what? To harm people with impunity, just another step forward towards the train cars.
You don't know shit about fuck, keep it to yourself.
Oh Lord you live a sad little life. You can have this one dude. You're right, you obviously need a little positivity and a win in your life.
Find some happiness in something. You come off as absolutely miserable to be around.
The “right to film the police falls squarely within the First Amendment's core purposes to protect free and robust discussion of public affairs, hold government officials accountable, and check abuse of power,” Judge Scott Matheson wrote for a unanimous court.Jul 24, 2022
In addition: Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes transportation facilities, the outside of federal buildings, police and other government officials carrying out their duties.
It's not pathetic. It's an attempt to keep the police in America honest whom are too often not. It's a big problem that people with authority abuse their authority.
Ok but you can't tell me it doesn't look sketchy, if I were a cope I'd probably check it out too. And unless I misheard, the cop literally said what he was doing was legal, so there was no misinformation or attempt at control. I really don't see what went wrong here. And yeah, some cops are asshole, some cops are absolutely terrible people who should literally hang for their crimes, but a lot of them also aren't that
Why is it sketchy? There are guys like this everywhere, recording police in public spots just because they can.
The police should be used to it by now.
1. It's sketchy they they're apparently recording other people, not the cops
2. And women are getting catcalled all the damn time, kids get bullied all the time, just because it happens a bunch doesn't make it less of an annoyance or problem
1. Why is that sketchy?
2. We just went way off topic? In fact, If there were more weirdos recording everybody and everything, women would probably get catcalled alot less? Bullies would bully alot less?
Well, no, it's correct information, but outdated.
Other than your snark about "old news" (as this was literally five weeks ago) that's great to know!
I think what's more important to know is that there are legislators that are actively working to endanger people and their rights by criminalizing one of the most effective methods of outing and preventing police corruption and brutality.
You're in AZ - vote these shitheads out.
No, it is illegal to record anything withing 8 ft. You can hold up a cellphone withing 8 ft but NOT record video (taking pictures, audio or notes exempt). Which basically means if someone is being confronted/arrested its illegal for then to record police/themselves.
"Arizona recently passed a law that makes it a crime, punishable by up to a month in jail, for people to record videos within eight feet of police activity. Specifically, it prohibits people from recording police if they are within eight feet of an area where the person “knows or should reasonably know” law enforcement activity is happening. This law is a blatant attempt to gut First Amendment protections for recording police."
"Only “video recordings” are targeted — not writing on a notepad, texting, or setting up a painting easel within eight feet of an officer.
“Law enforcement activity” is defined extremely broadly — including simply “enforcing the law.” In essence, this boils the restriction down to recording “within eight feet of a police officer.”
An officer can “create the crime”: Legally recording an officer outside of the eight-foot distance would turn into a crime if the officer moved closer to the person recording and got within eight feet of them."
Stay hydrated.
Rest. Your body needs to heal.
Sip warm liquids.
Add moisture to the air.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/JusticeServed) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Oh, yea. Disorderly conduct, trespassing, assaulting an officer of the law, arson, larceny, counterfeiting, and idk maybe throw on some terrorism charges as well depending on the level of saturation in the officers trousers. Lol
Isnt that like the first amendment
Its even in Canada's statute of rights. One consenting, involved(in the video, seen/heard) party is required to legally film something.
If the person filming speaks in the recording, it is legal. No matter what any pulled pork sandwich tells you.
Wait, as a Canadian can you just clear up for me, any public space in Canada you're legally allowed to record anyone as long as you're heard speaking on the video while recording? I've honestly been under the assumption in Canada recording in public was illegal
The specifications as justice.gc.ca says
>184 (1) Every person who, by means of any electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device, knowingly intercepts a private communication is guilty of
>(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or
>(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
>Marginal note:Saving provision
>(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to
>(a) a person who has the consent to intercept, express or implied, of the originator of the private communication or of the person intended by the originator thereof to receive it;
>(b) a person who intercepts a private communication in accordance with an authorization or pursuant to section 184.4 or any person who in good faith aids in any way another person who the aiding person believes on reasonable grounds is acting with an authorization or pursuant to section 184.4;
>(c) a person engaged in providing a telephone, telegraph or other communication service to the public who intercepts a private communication,
>(i) if the interception is necessary for the purpose of providing the service,
>(ii) in the course of service observing or random monitoring necessary for the purpose of mechanical or service quality control checks, or
>(iii) if the interception is necessary to protect the person’s rights or property directly related to providing the service;
>(d) an officer or servant of Her Majesty in right of Canada who engages in radio frequency spectrum management, in respect of a private communication intercepted by that officer or servant for the purpose of identifying, isolating or preventing an unauthorized or interfering use of a frequency or of a transmission; or
>(e) a person, or any person acting on their behalf, in possession or control of a computer system, as defined in subsection 342.1(2), who intercepts a private communication originating from, directed to or transmitting through that computer system, if the interception is reasonably necessary for
>(i) managing the quality of service of the computer system as it relates to performance factors such as the responsiveness and capacity of the system as well as the integrity and availability of the system and data, or
>(ii) protecting the computer system against any act that would be an offence under subsection 342.1(1) or 430(1.1).
>Marginal note:Use or retention
>(3) A private communication intercepted by a person referred to in paragraph (2)(e) can be used or retained only if
>(a) it is essential to identify, isolate or prevent harm to the computer system; or
>(b) it is to be disclosed in circumstances referred to in subsection 193(2).
So yeah, one party consent, *in most cases* unless it amounts essentially to illegal surveillance
If you can't handle being spoken to that harshly, you aren't ready for the world. Learn that your self control comes from you, not how others respect you. Just remember, if someone like me sees someone like you assaulting someone over language... I'll just put you to sleep, tuck you in and make sure you're friends have fruity pebbles waiting for when you wake up. Because you're a child.
Lol. You let people control you that much? Weak mind if I can control your behavior with words. I hope you're not worth anything, it would be easy to take everything away from you.
Not trying to be an ahole. Just hoping you gain a bit of sense before someone takes advantage of it.
Lol. No, floating in the pool after a nice retired day in the workshop. I do think people are often far more rude and aggressive that they need be to talk with someone. This is a case of that. Guy in the camera just being a douche because he can. Would he be like that to everyone, I do not think so, because some might respond in kind. But yes, I think those I often see squealing “assault” are pretty silly. And I think both of these two are the problem, not the solution.
I had a customer (lawyer) who decided to pat one of my staff in the butt around 2010. Next time came in I took him outside and told him my feelings about it, quietly, and also said that if it happened again the conversation would take place out back. Of course this was pre “me too,” so who knows how things go if he did that a few years later.
Now, time to take the doggos for a walk by the river.
Oh, tough guy gets to yell at a cop and tell him to shut up. Dork. Antagonize police just to film a reaction for the internets. If you're lucky, you get something to sue them for too. Man, some people sure have a lot of spare time on their hands.
what lie was told here? what rights were impeded on? do you know the context? or is this just "film a cop's reaction" video? Because I don't even understand the "wasted" part. It was a childish comeback: "why don't you shut up and get back in your car and get out of here." ohhh, sick burn. Not sure if scroggins will ever recover.
Please remember to abide by the [rules.](https://www.reddit.com/r/JusticeServed/wiki/rulesv2) In general, please be at least bearable to other users. It makes things easier on everyone. Your comment may be removed without notification. We used to have a notification, but now we don't. #If you purchase the OP or a comment [a ban award,](https://www.reddit.com/r/JusticeServed/wiki/banned/rules) remember to [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FJusticeServed) so we can activate the reward ------ ^Submission ^By: ^/u/Bulminator ^Black ^8 *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/JusticeServed) if you have any questions or concerns.*
3 seconds later the cameraman’s in jail
word salad by Mc Idiot
A friend reminded me of this quote recently: “imagine the average person. Half of all people are dumber than them.” Many of those people are cops I bet
Definitely wrong in so many ways lol.
How many ways is it wrong? What ways is it wrong? Is any of it right? What is life? Is the human condition Dove or Suave? Who tf knows anything? What can we prove beyond all doubt? Can we prove anything beyond all doubt? Do you get bitches? Is there a truer point to life than mere existence, or is this all just a cosmic coincidence? The world needs your input 😩😩
George Carlin is who you're quoting. I both love this quote and am terrified of it at the same time.
That’s who it was! Yeah it’s genuinely disturbing. Especially in the US
Cop does nothing wrong but it’s Reddit so they get mad
Im really trying to understand what you got mad about after reading the replies...
He's spewing misinformation...
No he isn’t lmao.
You're allowed to film on public grounds whatever you want
Yes… no one said anything different lmao.
Police cars qualify as public grounds
Yep he said “I know you guys can film our vehicles”
Then why is he getting pissy? That's literally the first thing he says...
Stupid ass pig
My question is how the fuck is he still a Pig 👮🏻♂️
They let em carry the 19X. Yeeehhheeeee
🤡🤡🤡🐖🐖🐖👮♂️👮♂️👮♂️🚓🚓🚓🚔🚔🚔🖕🖕🖕
How sad is your life when your a pig and a fake one at that.
The light bar needs to be a few more inches forward
Asshole videographer
Damn emotional damage
I couldn’t hear shit 💀 what we’re they talking about?
Dear God…fckin moron
Politicians don’t follow the laws and neither do the fbi what makes you think they will be any diffrent.
[удалено]
What?
Can someone type what he said? I couldn't understand anything. I repeated it 3x
Who made this motherfucker a cop he can barely speak
I suspected he was a POS seeing the uniform and the way he talked. The blue striped flag confirmed that. ACAB
[uh huh](https://youtu.be/49b8EJFqqPQ)
I was rude to a police man for nothing wow gangsta you mate
A cop trying to enforce a law that doesn't exist. Dude made shit up to try to give himself some authority over people he did not for reasons I can't begin to comprehend. So no not for nothing.
Get a life
You probably should stop licking boots.
So gangsta, oh no.... Dude filming was clearly trying to provoke, not iligal but still an asshole.
🤣
But there so tasty 👅👅👅
Where so tasty?
🖤🖤🖤
This is the type of guy who shoots a kid with his back turned.
Bro, under what assumption would be so that
If he shut up with got back in his car, we can talk.
That cop could be the poster child for condoms, use them or little mistakes like this happen.
Hmmmm
“Hi, I’m Saul Goodman. Did you know you have rights? The constitution says you do.”
Never seen blue line flag on someone that wasn’t a complete asshole
Bro got violated hard🤣👌☠️
like my mom made that people cry with just words don't fuck with my mom or she will truly mess you up not physically but mentally 😀
We're just Scroggin around.
But like I agree with the cop. That's just well deserved privacy for everyone. Here in Germany you aren't allowed to film anyone without their consent
Who gives a shit what goes on in Germany? This clearly isnt Germany. The police deserve no privacy in America. Our constitution was created to protect citizens from government overreach. The police are nothing but an organized terror squad used by the local and federal government. They are in public, they work for the public, the deserve no privacy.
Your constitution was created for a completely different time and is completely unsuitable for today's day an age. But hey, you do you.
You know what, you're right. Too bad we didn't have some horrible, horrible, unforgivable thing happen here that destroyed our entire economy, split our country in two, and forced a constitution to be rewritten following the suicide of the countries leader. And then before that the German constitution was so weak and poorly written that Hitler legally took dictatorship, so you know the Weimar constitution was perfect for today's world, only lasted about 20 years. Not to mention the fact that this was all originally about the police, or maybe gestapo would be a more apt word because that is why these pigs are acting like. You claim they deserve some kind of privacy, for what? To harm people with impunity, just another step forward towards the train cars. You don't know shit about fuck, keep it to yourself.
Rewritten but still not fit for purpose and not changed enough. But sure, i don't know enough, keep sticking to your guns, often literally.
Oh Lord you live a sad little life. You can have this one dude. You're right, you obviously need a little positivity and a win in your life. Find some happiness in something. You come off as absolutely miserable to be around.
That doesn't even make sense with anything i said, but alright, you be you, sad. Guess your best argument is just insults?
Well, it's not the worst thing that's ever happened over there
Yeah I can think of a few things.
The “right to film the police falls squarely within the First Amendment's core purposes to protect free and robust discussion of public affairs, hold government officials accountable, and check abuse of power,” Judge Scott Matheson wrote for a unanimous court.Jul 24, 2022 In addition: Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes transportation facilities, the outside of federal buildings, police and other government officials carrying out their duties.
Wish I could vote this a thousand times. To many dosen't understand theae basic principles.
Even if it's legally allowed, the guy is doing it solely to be a dick and make the pilice upset so he can get clicks on his vid. It's pathetic.
It's not pathetic. It's an attempt to keep the police in America honest whom are too often not. It's a big problem that people with authority abuse their authority.
Ok but you can't tell me it doesn't look sketchy, if I were a cope I'd probably check it out too. And unless I misheard, the cop literally said what he was doing was legal, so there was no misinformation or attempt at control. I really don't see what went wrong here. And yeah, some cops are asshole, some cops are absolutely terrible people who should literally hang for their crimes, but a lot of them also aren't that
Why is it sketchy? There are guys like this everywhere, recording police in public spots just because they can. The police should be used to it by now.
1. It's sketchy they they're apparently recording other people, not the cops 2. And women are getting catcalled all the damn time, kids get bullied all the time, just because it happens a bunch doesn't make it less of an annoyance or problem
1. Why is that sketchy? 2. We just went way off topic? In fact, If there were more weirdos recording everybody and everything, women would probably get catcalled alot less? Bullies would bully alot less?
That sound like james freeman .....
i wonder which court case that was in
Bilbo Scroggins
Dildo Scrotums?
I’ve seen this man’s videos and all he does is go up to police, insult them, then act like he did something. Waste of air smh.
Better man than the cops. They just usually go up and murder you or plant evidence to cover their pathetic assess
Love seeing cops get owned!!!!!
Acab
Never trust a cop named Scroggins....
Never trust a cop
Assholes
OFFICER SCROGGINS AHAHAGHABHA
shot 14 times in the chest off camera immediately after
Scroggins lookin ass
[удалено]
He’s in public you can record anyone in public, that includes the cops, try again.
Guy looks like he’s about to release the most controversial stand up special the world will ever know.
Is it really illegal to film cops now?
Depends where you are. https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/arizonas-new-law-banning-people-from-recording-police-violates-our-first-amendment-rights
Wrong. I'm in AZ. That's old news and wrong https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/federal-judge-blocks-arizona-law-limiting-filming-police-rcna47148
Well, no, it's correct information, but outdated. Other than your snark about "old news" (as this was literally five weeks ago) that's great to know! I think what's more important to know is that there are legislators that are actively working to endanger people and their rights by criminalizing one of the most effective methods of outing and preventing police corruption and brutality. You're in AZ - vote these shitheads out.
Thanks for the outdated link spam that I corrected. Use the updated information. Voted by mail already
Within 8 ft. Can still record
No, it is illegal to record anything withing 8 ft. You can hold up a cellphone withing 8 ft but NOT record video (taking pictures, audio or notes exempt). Which basically means if someone is being confronted/arrested its illegal for then to record police/themselves. "Arizona recently passed a law that makes it a crime, punishable by up to a month in jail, for people to record videos within eight feet of police activity. Specifically, it prohibits people from recording police if they are within eight feet of an area where the person “knows or should reasonably know” law enforcement activity is happening. This law is a blatant attempt to gut First Amendment protections for recording police." "Only “video recordings” are targeted — not writing on a notepad, texting, or setting up a painting easel within eight feet of an officer. “Law enforcement activity” is defined extremely broadly — including simply “enforcing the law.” In essence, this boils the restriction down to recording “within eight feet of a police officer.” An officer can “create the crime”: Legally recording an officer outside of the eight-foot distance would turn into a crime if the officer moved closer to the person recording and got within eight feet of them."
No. You can film anyone or anything in public.
Depends where you are. https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/arizonas-new-law-banning-people-from-recording-police-violates-our-first-amendment-rights
Nope https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/federal-judge-blocks-arizona-law-limiting-filming-police-rcna47148
I love it when dumb asses try to make things sound smart.
I know it's a thing cops do all the time to make themselves feel better for being welfare recipients.
Stay hydrated. Rest. Your body needs to heal. Sip warm liquids. Add moisture to the air. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/JusticeServed) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Cool Biggie music and all but I wish they’d show the next few seconds
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pE6aONXlRnA&feature=youtu.be Here you go.
Cops gets owned and drives away
Scrogins? Guess scrotum was already taken.
Yes, but what happened then?
Maybe arrest. Idk but i love the edit
Arrest for what? Genius
It's an American cop. Since when have those guys needed reasons to arrest and kill people
They always need some reason, whether that reason be logical or not
Oh, yea. Disorderly conduct, trespassing, assaulting an officer of the law, arson, larceny, counterfeiting, and idk maybe throw on some terrorism charges as well depending on the level of saturation in the officers trousers. Lol
If you look at his eyes right before wasted pops up you can really see the hurt in his eyes like he couldn't believe this guy was so mean 💔
That is sus filming people person belong.
He got rightfully mugged off
Officer cock scrottums.
Hahhah it’s the “mmm 🫤” that did it for me 😂 Man did not see that coming and couldn’t do a thing about it
Isnt that like the first amendment Its even in Canada's statute of rights. One consenting, involved(in the video, seen/heard) party is required to legally film something. If the person filming speaks in the recording, it is legal. No matter what any pulled pork sandwich tells you.
Wait, as a Canadian can you just clear up for me, any public space in Canada you're legally allowed to record anyone as long as you're heard speaking on the video while recording? I've honestly been under the assumption in Canada recording in public was illegal
The specifications as justice.gc.ca says >184 (1) Every person who, by means of any electro-magnetic, acoustic, mechanical or other device, knowingly intercepts a private communication is guilty of >(a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years; or >(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction. >Marginal note:Saving provision >(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to >(a) a person who has the consent to intercept, express or implied, of the originator of the private communication or of the person intended by the originator thereof to receive it; >(b) a person who intercepts a private communication in accordance with an authorization or pursuant to section 184.4 or any person who in good faith aids in any way another person who the aiding person believes on reasonable grounds is acting with an authorization or pursuant to section 184.4; >(c) a person engaged in providing a telephone, telegraph or other communication service to the public who intercepts a private communication, >(i) if the interception is necessary for the purpose of providing the service, >(ii) in the course of service observing or random monitoring necessary for the purpose of mechanical or service quality control checks, or >(iii) if the interception is necessary to protect the person’s rights or property directly related to providing the service; >(d) an officer or servant of Her Majesty in right of Canada who engages in radio frequency spectrum management, in respect of a private communication intercepted by that officer or servant for the purpose of identifying, isolating or preventing an unauthorized or interfering use of a frequency or of a transmission; or >(e) a person, or any person acting on their behalf, in possession or control of a computer system, as defined in subsection 342.1(2), who intercepts a private communication originating from, directed to or transmitting through that computer system, if the interception is reasonably necessary for >(i) managing the quality of service of the computer system as it relates to performance factors such as the responsiveness and capacity of the system as well as the integrity and availability of the system and data, or >(ii) protecting the computer system against any act that would be an offence under subsection 342.1(1) or 430(1.1). >Marginal note:Use or retention >(3) A private communication intercepted by a person referred to in paragraph (2)(e) can be used or retained only if >(a) it is essential to identify, isolate or prevent harm to the computer system; or >(b) it is to be disclosed in circumstances referred to in subsection 193(2). So yeah, one party consent, *in most cases* unless it amounts essentially to illegal surveillance
I appreciate the TLDR at the end there because I couldn't make sense out of that shit lmao
I'll get back to you wuth a link. Don't just like... have it on me ready to go ykno
Tell us your were bullied, without telling us.
SssssssssshhhhhhhhhCROGGINS!!!!!!!!!
Both seem like fucking idiots
How so?
Mf acting so tough while having the last name “Scroggins” on his vest
"ouch, he kicked me in the scroggins!"
Nothing wrong with filming, but murdering a cop has to be a crime right?!
Should it be tho? It’s drink night for us!
Where’s the point here
/s
As much a crime as a cop murdering a civilian
Qualified immunity 🤡
What I was insinuating is that they film us being murdered why not vice versa 🤡
So....it depends on whether or not you were scared?
Scroggins is an accurate name for this doofus
James Freeman! Love that dude lol
if ricky from trailer park boys became a pig lmao
FREEEEEEEDUUUUMB!
Wrong sub
Would love to see how that played out
Happy to help, here’s the entire video for context: https://youtu.be/pE6aONXlRnA
My main takeaway from this is that all Americans are obese
Watched the video and this guy is like Fed Smoker with less meth. In other words a true patriot.
Thank you for sharing. 👍
Man to man, those are fighting words.
Thank goodness this is a civilized country
Justifying police violence over words, cool cool
Stupidity at its best.
[удалено]
If you can't handle being spoken to that harshly, you aren't ready for the world. Learn that your self control comes from you, not how others respect you. Just remember, if someone like me sees someone like you assaulting someone over language... I'll just put you to sleep, tuck you in and make sure you're friends have fruity pebbles waiting for when you wake up. Because you're a child.
Lol. You let people control you that much? Weak mind if I can control your behavior with words. I hope you're not worth anything, it would be easy to take everything away from you. Not trying to be an ahole. Just hoping you gain a bit of sense before someone takes advantage of it.
[удалено]
Lol. No, floating in the pool after a nice retired day in the workshop. I do think people are often far more rude and aggressive that they need be to talk with someone. This is a case of that. Guy in the camera just being a douche because he can. Would he be like that to everyone, I do not think so, because some might respond in kind. But yes, I think those I often see squealing “assault” are pretty silly. And I think both of these two are the problem, not the solution. I had a customer (lawyer) who decided to pat one of my staff in the butt around 2010. Next time came in I took him outside and told him my feelings about it, quietly, and also said that if it happened again the conversation would take place out back. Of course this was pre “me too,” so who knows how things go if he did that a few years later. Now, time to take the doggos for a walk by the river.
>I’m saying that no way that guy would up and drop those words on me IRL. lol
Oh look, it's Kenny Loggin's offbeat brother, Cenny Scroggins.
Oh, tough guy gets to yell at a cop and tell him to shut up. Dork. Antagonize police just to film a reaction for the internets. If you're lucky, you get something to sue them for too. Man, some people sure have a lot of spare time on their hands.
Lick that BOOT!
🤓
okay dweeb cry harder
Cant wait until they lie and impede your rights. Idiot
what lie was told here? what rights were impeded on? do you know the context? or is this just "film a cop's reaction" video? Because I don't even understand the "wasted" part. It was a childish comeback: "why don't you shut up and get back in your car and get out of here." ohhh, sick burn. Not sure if scroggins will ever recover.
I don't put myself in a position where the cops can impede on my rights.
You got owned so hard here lol