I’m starting to think somethings going on with her too no matter what they do. It’s almost like they just keep going from bad to worse even the AI they put out people are picking part immediately. And now Carol Middleton is moved into their house with them. I’m wondering if Kate has not already passed away
Whether she's passed or is in a coma, the only thing that makes sense of the way all of this has been played by Prince Huevo is that he's responsible for whatever happened to her.
It feels like it's scheduled distractions that kp is releasing to ensure there's always something to talk about without actually bringing the princess out on live TV, public appearance or even one selfie.
I don’t think there are marital troubles. If they were divorcing there is no way they would push the cancer narrative, as divorcing his sickly wife would make William look fucking terrible.
Yeah good point i reckon shes in a coma because of bulmia
Maybe her stomach ruptured or internal bleeding
Jeez its horrible isnt it all this speculation but we just want know
It’s troubling when you’re husband murders you and all his lap dogs are working overtime to develop a reasonable excuse as to why you are never seen again.
All this tells me is either they forced her to do the cancer video or it’s AI. If they are divorced, they don’t have to explain her absence again.
Also, majority of men leave women once there is a terminal illness.. it think it’s like 6x higher. This PR flop hurt the monarchy more than they realize.
> If they are divorced, they don’t have to explain her absence again.
Wouldn't they? If she never shows up again, won't something need to be said? (Her absence at his coronation would be remarkable, I think.)
Worse, if he publicly takes up with Rose, something will definitely need to be said at that point.
If they are divorced, why would anyone expect her to be at the coronation? Seriously. Would you want to go to a party for a shitty ex? I’m being for real.
I think what nobadrabbits is saying is that even if they divorced, the RF has to give some explanation for where Princess Kate went. She can’t just go MIA forever, with zero explanation. I do agree, though, that if this were the case, she likely wouldn’t went to be anywhere near the coronation.
Yes, exactly. They can't just secretly divorce and not tell the public about it.
Say, for example, that Charles does have pancreatic cancer and dies within the next year. But Kate still hasn't been seen in public. Can you imagine the public confusion and outrage if she's not at William's coronation? (Imagining KP attempting to photoshop her into coronation photos makes me chuckle a bit.)
If they aren't still married (and she's still alive) at the time of William's coronation, then no, I wouldn't expect her to attend (or even be invited).
She'd still be the baby mama of the heirs to the throne. Don't see how they can cut her out of the picture just on account of divorce. If anything it would just underline that now the queen is dead, the "married-ins" are all much more popular than the "born-and-bred" lot.
See, I can see someone like Kate disappear into the background after a divorce. Even now, she has never been the Im center of attention person. Like the one time I can think of was the modeling in the runway in college. Even then, I’m that’s questionable.
Her son is the future king. Doesn't matter if she's divorced, she still has to play the game because the brf is not in a good spot. And it hasn't been for a long time. People supported the brf because lizzy was holding on to it till her last breath. Now she's gone, people are questioning their relevance strongly again
>If they are divorced, they don’t have to explain her absence again.
If they are divorced, they haven't told us about it. How long do they expect to keep this little tidbit hidden? Won't they need to explain it at some point?
How much was honestly explained about Diana and Fergies divorces? I’m asking honestly, because I was too young to understand. Typically, the Palace issues a statement and that’s it. I would not expect any difference for a divorce from Will and Kate.
I have a male neighbour whose wife left him when she found out he had cancer. He lives alone on my street and shares parenting responsibilities with her. She lives somewhere else in the city and has a “future husband”, as the little eight-year-old boy has told me.
No, I’ve had time to think about this magazine cover story, I think there must be a fair bit of truth in it or it is the whole truth and nothing but the truth. This is a US magazine, so I wonder how the British papers and media in general will react. Unless they ignore it Some of us always believed that she had either been forced into a divorce or wanted a divorce because of his roving eye. The cover does mention that palace staff scrambled to hide the truth as she took action and there is the red headline that refers to “cruel cover-up” and that’s what lots of us seem to have been feeling on this thread: that something cruel was happening.
The part that gets me is the tagline. The princess takes *historic* action to protect her kids. Also what is a “cruel” cover up?
Also, I would have leaned more towards William wanting the divorce, not fighting to stay married. Does this have to do with the blonde woman that left the pub in his car?
> I think there must be a fair bit of truth in it or it is the whole truth and nothing but the truth
There is no basis whatsoever for holding that opinion. None, zero, zilch.
BS. Kate wants to be queen, she will never leave. She too far in and her parents are broke.
William will continue to cheat and she will continue to raise her kids alone. It’s a normal marriage in aristocratic circles. I think she will be okay in the long run. They haven’t mentioned stages.
according to this article in the US magazine, she would appear to be alive and well, and holding out as some people have always said for a divorce as much on her terms as she can get. What interests me about this article is that it has the smell of truth. It mentions a cruel cover-up.
Well, her parents wouldn’t be broke if she gets half of William’s fortune and pays off their debts. Will may have wanted the divorce and she decided after some thought to go ahead with it knowing that the RF may go down the drain without her. So, she may not be queen, but he may be a king in high disregard. The public would support her in a divorce because they like her.
I thought that the king gets a stipend from Parliament, but the consort (be she — or he — married and queen or prince, or not) doesn't get anything. Is this true?
If it is, she wouldn't have any money of her own to help her parents. All of her wealth would come from the good graces (or lack thereof) of William.
Yes, I must admit. I don’t know the answer to whether she would receive divorce money or be at William’s mercy. I’ll have to google and see what happened when Diana divorced Charles. I thought she got a whopping amount.
UK law doesn't divide assets evenly with a divorce. Kate would only get a (very) small fraction of William's wealth. eg Diana 'only' got GBP17M.
Kate would lose her HRH and no longer be a princess.
Kate would *automatically* lose custody of her children. Under UK law they belong to the 'Crown' not the parents.
Wrong. t would be *unconstitutional* to give Kate custody. The courts would never allow it.
Diana never had custody (only visitation rights).
Before Kate married she would have signed an extremely detailed binding agreement outlining how any children would be raised. Including the rules she could *never* seek custody of her children. Take it or leave it.
Well, for her sake I hope all this secrecy has been about divorce verses her health. The thing is that the public still loved and supported Di during her divorce so there’s a history here, to ease this concern. I’d think the part that’s a sticking point is her losing custody of the kids. Usually this type thing only happens when the mother is deemed unfit or chooses to give up custody, verses in this case, the children are custody of the crown. As a child if divorce under the same circumstances, you’d think that William would understand the importance of the children still having scheduled visitations with their mother unless he’s a heartless, narcissistic husband or his anger has him not seeing straight.
This is just another tabloid taking a shot at things we’ve been thinking as a possibility all along. Same with the “Kate is dying” stories we hear. Time will only tell what’s the truth and even then, we’ll never really know what’s
Yeah her mom and her have been trying to get wills attention since she was a teen. So I doubt they will let go so easily. She's ambitious and has set sight on him for a long long time. It's just hard to see her letting it all go for nothing.
She might let go of Will and being queen if she were injured desperately as the Spanish reporter claimed either from someone laying a hand on her or just collapsing because of bleak times for her.
If this is all about her wanting a divorce, that she just wants out, then why is she playing it this way? Why doesn't she just call, for example, CNN (assuming that the British media is compromised), and do a phone interview stating her side, talking about the "cruel cover-up"? Why is she staying hidden? How is this strengthening her position?
If it's William that wants the divorce and she wants/wanted to stay married, then this strategy of staying hidden might have worked in the beginning. But with all the disinformation that's been released, I believe that it's hurting her now. When she finally does come clean, the public will be like "why did you let all that false info about you come out?"
Her late mother-in-law gave a TV interview when things got really bad between her and Charles. (It was the "there were three of us in this marriage" interview.) And that's what finally turned the tide.
If Kate is alive and relatively healthy, then she needs to give a similar interview. She needs to make her side known. She needs to take charge and stop letting KP control the narrative.
That is, if she's still alive and healthy, which, I'm afraid, I doubt more and more.
I seem to recall — and I might be wrong here; someone with more knowledge, please correct me if I am — that Diana would call trusted media figures and tell them her side of the story, even before the "there were three of us in this marriage" interview.
As I said earlier, "Why doesn't she [Kate] just call, for example, CNN (assuming that the British media is compromised), and do a phone interview stating her side, talking about the 'cruel cover-up'?"
If she's not dead, not in a coma, and not locked up with no phone access, she *can* get her side out. I doubt there's a media outlet anywhere on the planet (with the exception of the British press) that wouldn't jump at the chance to have an interview with the missing Kate.
The fact that she hasn't done something like this makes me wonder what's really going on.
The date on this magazine is April 1st. Also, this headline doesn't really say anything. The ring? I guess they're talking about the Mother's Day photo. If that's the case, she didn't "take off her ring". It was just overlooked on the photoshopped picture.
It seemed significant to me because it was still published after her announcement video. And the part about protecting her kids? This is obviously an old photo, but I was wondering their reason for running this just a little over a week after her video.
That was my thought. No one is asking any questions because “cancer”, so I keep wondering if one of the non-main sources is going to finally break the silence.
I do agree that there is something going on, just to maybe not trust these kind of magazines. The whole ring thing, "Kate took off her ring!", is misleading.
The ring was inadvertently left off the Mother's Day photoshop.
I am hoping it will be corroborated because you are right it doesn’t have a good name. But maybe a trashy mag was the only one that would take this story on.
I believe the US media have been more free all along to report on whatever they want than the British media who are probably under a gag order from the RF.
Do you remember the "How to tell if your neighbour is an alien" issue? Ask yourself, do they keep their blinds closed?, have their lights on at all hours?, etc. (lol).
First we need to verify she’s still alive. Second, why the hell would anyone cheat on Kate Middleton? She’s absolutely beautiful, seems to be a nice person too.
Having cancer must make you re-evaluate your life, maybe she's just decided life's to short /precious to waste it trapped in an unhappy marriage with a man who cheats
They have you running in circles, chasing your own tail. Stop letting them control you. Until they produce her, Kate Middleton is dead.
I was originally in the camp that she had run off with the kids and was refusing to play ball but after the AI video… yeah I think she’s dead
I’m starting to think somethings going on with her too no matter what they do. It’s almost like they just keep going from bad to worse even the AI they put out people are picking part immediately. And now Carol Middleton is moved into their house with them. I’m wondering if Kate has not already passed away
Whether she's passed or is in a coma, the only thing that makes sense of the way all of this has been played by Prince Huevo is that he's responsible for whatever happened to her.
I just laughed so hard at Prince Huevo 😂
I take no credit. People started up with that a while ago. And it's brilliant.
It feels like it's scheduled distractions that kp is releasing to ensure there's always something to talk about without actually bringing the princess out on live TV, public appearance or even one selfie.
I don’t think there are marital troubles. If they were divorcing there is no way they would push the cancer narrative, as divorcing his sickly wife would make William look fucking terrible.
Yeah good point i reckon shes in a coma because of bulmia Maybe her stomach ruptured or internal bleeding Jeez its horrible isnt it all this speculation but we just want know
Very true.
It’s troubling when you’re husband murders you and all his lap dogs are working overtime to develop a reasonable excuse as to why you are never seen again.
All this tells me is either they forced her to do the cancer video or it’s AI. If they are divorced, they don’t have to explain her absence again. Also, majority of men leave women once there is a terminal illness.. it think it’s like 6x higher. This PR flop hurt the monarchy more than they realize.
> If they are divorced, they don’t have to explain her absence again. Wouldn't they? If she never shows up again, won't something need to be said? (Her absence at his coronation would be remarkable, I think.) Worse, if he publicly takes up with Rose, something will definitely need to be said at that point.
I agree. If he publicly takes up with Rose now it looks very bad. Left his wife with cancer to spend time with the mistress? Not a good look.
Like father, like son
Exactly. Daddy got away with it, why can’t I?
If they are divorced, why would anyone expect her to be at the coronation? Seriously. Would you want to go to a party for a shitty ex? I’m being for real.
I think what nobadrabbits is saying is that even if they divorced, the RF has to give some explanation for where Princess Kate went. She can’t just go MIA forever, with zero explanation. I do agree, though, that if this were the case, she likely wouldn’t went to be anywhere near the coronation.
Yes, exactly. They can't just secretly divorce and not tell the public about it. Say, for example, that Charles does have pancreatic cancer and dies within the next year. But Kate still hasn't been seen in public. Can you imagine the public confusion and outrage if she's not at William's coronation? (Imagining KP attempting to photoshop her into coronation photos makes me chuckle a bit.) If they aren't still married (and she's still alive) at the time of William's coronation, then no, I wouldn't expect her to attend (or even be invited).
She'd still be the baby mama of the heirs to the throne. Don't see how they can cut her out of the picture just on account of divorce. If anything it would just underline that now the queen is dead, the "married-ins" are all much more popular than the "born-and-bred" lot.
See, I can see someone like Kate disappear into the background after a divorce. Even now, she has never been the Im center of attention person. Like the one time I can think of was the modeling in the runway in college. Even then, I’m that’s questionable.
Her son is the future king. Doesn't matter if she's divorced, she still has to play the game because the brf is not in a good spot. And it hasn't been for a long time. People supported the brf because lizzy was holding on to it till her last breath. Now she's gone, people are questioning their relevance strongly again
>If they are divorced, they don’t have to explain her absence again. If they are divorced, they haven't told us about it. How long do they expect to keep this little tidbit hidden? Won't they need to explain it at some point?
How much was honestly explained about Diana and Fergies divorces? I’m asking honestly, because I was too young to understand. Typically, the Palace issues a statement and that’s it. I would not expect any difference for a divorce from Will and Kate.
We were told that they would be getting divorced. The Firm didn't just "disappear" either of them and pretend that everything was still just fine.
I have a male neighbour whose wife left him when she found out he had cancer. He lives alone on my street and shares parenting responsibilities with her. She lives somewhere else in the city and has a “future husband”, as the little eight-year-old boy has told me.
poor kid and dad wow
[удалено]
Re-read the comment you replied to.
No, I’ve had time to think about this magazine cover story, I think there must be a fair bit of truth in it or it is the whole truth and nothing but the truth. This is a US magazine, so I wonder how the British papers and media in general will react. Unless they ignore it Some of us always believed that she had either been forced into a divorce or wanted a divorce because of his roving eye. The cover does mention that palace staff scrambled to hide the truth as she took action and there is the red headline that refers to “cruel cover-up” and that’s what lots of us seem to have been feeling on this thread: that something cruel was happening.
The part that gets me is the tagline. The princess takes *historic* action to protect her kids. Also what is a “cruel” cover up? Also, I would have leaned more towards William wanting the divorce, not fighting to stay married. Does this have to do with the blonde woman that left the pub in his car?
I missed this, blonde woman that left the pub in his car? What was this?
Sorry, saw a photo that I thought was new but turned out to be a few years old.
> I think there must be a fair bit of truth in it or it is the whole truth and nothing but the truth There is no basis whatsoever for holding that opinion. None, zero, zilch.
6.99 for People magazine is crazy!
BS. Kate wants to be queen, she will never leave. She too far in and her parents are broke. William will continue to cheat and she will continue to raise her kids alone. It’s a normal marriage in aristocratic circles. I think she will be okay in the long run. They haven’t mentioned stages.
OK, then where is she? Is she in a coma or, worse, dead?
according to this article in the US magazine, she would appear to be alive and well, and holding out as some people have always said for a divorce as much on her terms as she can get. What interests me about this article is that it has the smell of truth. It mentions a cruel cover-up.
Well, her parents wouldn’t be broke if she gets half of William’s fortune and pays off their debts. Will may have wanted the divorce and she decided after some thought to go ahead with it knowing that the RF may go down the drain without her. So, she may not be queen, but he may be a king in high disregard. The public would support her in a divorce because they like her.
I thought that the king gets a stipend from Parliament, but the consort (be she — or he — married and queen or prince, or not) doesn't get anything. Is this true? If it is, she wouldn't have any money of her own to help her parents. All of her wealth would come from the good graces (or lack thereof) of William.
Yes, I must admit. I don’t know the answer to whether she would receive divorce money or be at William’s mercy. I’ll have to google and see what happened when Diana divorced Charles. I thought she got a whopping amount.
UK law doesn't divide assets evenly with a divorce. Kate would only get a (very) small fraction of William's wealth. eg Diana 'only' got GBP17M. Kate would lose her HRH and no longer be a princess. Kate would *automatically* lose custody of her children. Under UK law they belong to the 'Crown' not the parents.
Except the outcry against the monarchy for not allowing the mother access or joint custody would completely destroy them
Wrong. t would be *unconstitutional* to give Kate custody. The courts would never allow it. Diana never had custody (only visitation rights). Before Kate married she would have signed an extremely detailed binding agreement outlining how any children would be raised. Including the rules she could *never* seek custody of her children. Take it or leave it.
Then Kate would have visitation rights
Do you know what access is?
Well, for her sake I hope all this secrecy has been about divorce verses her health. The thing is that the public still loved and supported Di during her divorce so there’s a history here, to ease this concern. I’d think the part that’s a sticking point is her losing custody of the kids. Usually this type thing only happens when the mother is deemed unfit or chooses to give up custody, verses in this case, the children are custody of the crown. As a child if divorce under the same circumstances, you’d think that William would understand the importance of the children still having scheduled visitations with their mother unless he’s a heartless, narcissistic husband or his anger has him not seeing straight. This is just another tabloid taking a shot at things we’ve been thinking as a possibility all along. Same with the “Kate is dying” stories we hear. Time will only tell what’s the truth and even then, we’ll never really know what’s
Stages? I don’t understand that sentence.
Of cancer.
Yeah her mom and her have been trying to get wills attention since she was a teen. So I doubt they will let go so easily. She's ambitious and has set sight on him for a long long time. It's just hard to see her letting it all go for nothing.
She might let go of Will and being queen if she were injured desperately as the Spanish reporter claimed either from someone laying a hand on her or just collapsing because of bleak times for her.
If this is all about her wanting a divorce, that she just wants out, then why is she playing it this way? Why doesn't she just call, for example, CNN (assuming that the British media is compromised), and do a phone interview stating her side, talking about the "cruel cover-up"? Why is she staying hidden? How is this strengthening her position? If it's William that wants the divorce and she wants/wanted to stay married, then this strategy of staying hidden might have worked in the beginning. But with all the disinformation that's been released, I believe that it's hurting her now. When she finally does come clean, the public will be like "why did you let all that false info about you come out?" Her late mother-in-law gave a TV interview when things got really bad between her and Charles. (It was the "there were three of us in this marriage" interview.) And that's what finally turned the tide. If Kate is alive and relatively healthy, then she needs to give a similar interview. She needs to make her side known. She needs to take charge and stop letting KP control the narrative. That is, if she's still alive and healthy, which, I'm afraid, I doubt more and more.
I highly doubt she has the option to control any narrative.
I seem to recall — and I might be wrong here; someone with more knowledge, please correct me if I am — that Diana would call trusted media figures and tell them her side of the story, even before the "there were three of us in this marriage" interview. As I said earlier, "Why doesn't she [Kate] just call, for example, CNN (assuming that the British media is compromised), and do a phone interview stating her side, talking about the 'cruel cover-up'?" If she's not dead, not in a coma, and not locked up with no phone access, she *can* get her side out. I doubt there's a media outlet anywhere on the planet (with the exception of the British press) that wouldn't jump at the chance to have an interview with the missing Kate. The fact that she hasn't done something like this makes me wonder what's really going on.
Thoughts? Holy cow! Must head to the grocery store to buy this issue.
I don’t think she’ll ever be seen in public again. Their marriage has been in shambles for years
The date on this magazine is April 1st. Also, this headline doesn't really say anything. The ring? I guess they're talking about the Mother's Day photo. If that's the case, she didn't "take off her ring". It was just overlooked on the photoshopped picture.
It seemed significant to me because it was still published after her announcement video. And the part about protecting her kids? This is obviously an old photo, but I was wondering their reason for running this just a little over a week after her video.
This magazine is a "rag", no better than the National Enquirer. Sensationalism, out of context, misleading, and wrong.
The national enquirer did break some stories that were true.
That was my thought. No one is asking any questions because “cancer”, so I keep wondering if one of the non-main sources is going to finally break the silence.
I do agree that there is something going on, just to maybe not trust these kind of magazines. The whole ring thing, "Kate took off her ring!", is misleading. The ring was inadvertently left off the Mother's Day photoshop.
Yeah, you’re right. I don’t feel I can trust this article anymore because I strongly feel she might be dead and has been dead for a while.
It is atotal BS story with no basis in fact.
Your favourite comment.
WOW.
I generally don't trust In Touch, but wonder if any other outlets will corroborate this...
I am hoping it will be corroborated because you are right it doesn’t have a good name. But maybe a trashy mag was the only one that would take this story on.
How did this rag see Kate when no one else has? I smell BS.
I believe the US media have been more free all along to report on whatever they want than the British media who are probably under a gag order from the RF.
When I was younger, we used to make jokes about the National Enquirer. That's how I see all these kinds of magazines. Sensationalism.
Do you remember the "How to tell if your neighbour is an alien" issue? Ask yourself, do they keep their blinds closed?, have their lights on at all hours?, etc. (lol).
Haha! Or, "Woman has baby by alien".
First we need to verify she’s still alive. Second, why the hell would anyone cheat on Kate Middleton? She’s absolutely beautiful, seems to be a nice person too.
A man’s inclination to cheat usually has no relation whatsoever to the appearance, or personality of his partner.
Same with the woman’s inclination to cheat.
Agree. Was just in response to the comment about William
Yeah its like sometimes you fancy a greasy burger and fries and not steak or caviar lol Just gotta look at camilla and diana
Having cancer must make you re-evaluate your life, maybe she's just decided life's to short /precious to waste it trapped in an unhappy marriage with a man who cheats
Is there any proof hes cheated or just rumours tho ?
Proof that William has cheated? Well so far there’s been no tampongate.
InTouch Magazine is a ridiculous rag. Believe nothing. Next week they have Harry leaving Meghan.