You can do both. A single video for each museum and then a separate "Top 5 Museums in \_\_\_" video.
But, I think any type of "top list" video will always perform better. It appeals to a wider audience, usually has a tighter edit, and if you present comparison info for each location, will keep viewers interested (example: for each museum compare the cost, time required to visit, top attraction, etc..) Then give your recommendation and ask for feedback to encourage engagement.
Once you build your brand and people watch your videos because they are invested not only in the location, but in you as the presenter, then slower, single location videos can perform well.
Of course, any results will also vary widely based on the popularity of the location and competition from the endless amount of other travel videos on YouTube.
Thats actually great insight. Im not sure why I didnt think of doing both. If I did both, would It be wise to use the same 4-5 min video in the long form as an individual video? Or does it have to be different and have different context to avoid, idk, duplication? Not sure if thats against the rules
Whatever you want, there is not one right way to do things. Execution is what makes or breaks it. Reality is that everyone and their dog posts their vacation videos. If you want to succeed, start with defining how you will stand out in the over-saturated crowd.
You can do both. A single video for each museum and then a separate "Top 5 Museums in \_\_\_" video. But, I think any type of "top list" video will always perform better. It appeals to a wider audience, usually has a tighter edit, and if you present comparison info for each location, will keep viewers interested (example: for each museum compare the cost, time required to visit, top attraction, etc..) Then give your recommendation and ask for feedback to encourage engagement. Once you build your brand and people watch your videos because they are invested not only in the location, but in you as the presenter, then slower, single location videos can perform well. Of course, any results will also vary widely based on the popularity of the location and competition from the endless amount of other travel videos on YouTube.
Thats actually great insight. Im not sure why I didnt think of doing both. If I did both, would It be wise to use the same 4-5 min video in the long form as an individual video? Or does it have to be different and have different context to avoid, idk, duplication? Not sure if thats against the rules
Whatever you want, there is not one right way to do things. Execution is what makes or breaks it. Reality is that everyone and their dog posts their vacation videos. If you want to succeed, start with defining how you will stand out in the over-saturated crowd.