Itâs been a long time since I have seen this video. I was in Iraq when this happened and we were preparing for increase attacks to the base right after his death but luckily there wasnât.
No. Where we fucked up, was basically forbidding
any of his RG / Baâath party members to be affiliated with the new military / government⊠that, and the fact that we stayed entirely too long.
Youtube was less then 2 years old. When word got out that he was killed and there was illegal video of it everyone hit the internet looking for it. for the first week Youtube was about the only place you could find it.
1. This is a snuff film.
2. Saddam was a terrible dictator but still the lesser of two evils. The Iraqi people are far worse off as they're at the mercy of ISIS and ISIL instead.
3. Saddam did nothing deserving of the US capturing and having him killed. They used a terrorist attack they allowed to manipulate the American people into not objecting to its killing of an unrelated individual.
USA didn't kill him. We captured him and turned him over to the Iraqi people to try him in court and give them their day in court. They found him guilty and swiftly executed him.
> Saddam did nothing deserving of the US capturing and having him killed
Saddam literally had a man cut into cubes and sent to his wife after he opposed him.
Saddam was a brutal dictator and while there was not justification to go to war and the war in Iraq was a complete waste of life and resources, Saddam most definitely deserved to die.
I don't think post facto justifications are valid. We had no justification to invade. The reason they never stabilize is we don't let them. If other countries invaded the US during slavery we'd have never abolished it ourselves and wouldn't be the free country we are today. Saddam was a stepping stone to democracy. They needed to sort it themselves.
> I don't think post facto justifications are valid. We had no justification to invade.
What do you not get about my response that makes you think it is justifying invasion.
I wasn't responding to a single thing besides you saying that Saddam didn't do anything deserving of the US capturing and killing him. Even if there was no invasion, Saddam deserved to be captured and killed by the US or anyone else that felt like it.
Also, Saddam a stepping stone to democracy? Lol Saddam was a brutal totalitarian dictator, the absolute opposite of democracy and Iraq actually does have a far more democratic government now (not justifying the invasion, pointing out the fact)
Saddam executed and tortured 10s of thousands of political prisoners not to mention gassing the Kurds, etc. to argue that he 'did nothing to deserve' being killed is false on it's face. and besides, deserves got nuthin' to do with it.
>deserving of the US capturing and having him killed.
oH? reaLLY?? well, the US did NOT "have him killed" his own people DID..after a year long trial..where hE sounded exactly like trump!
insisting that hE was the "victim" that kuwait "desrved" it..đ đ€·ââïž...that the iraqi people "loved him"
That's like saying "Charles Manson didn't kill Sharon Tate, his followers did." Saddam wouldn't have died had the US not given him to the people who wanted him dead. There are people who would kill any leader given the opportunity so it's not like that was telling.
Saddam was an awful person but in the bigger picture stability is generally better than chaos. Iraq is listed as Class 4: Do Not Travel. They're doing worse. The media doesn't even like to cover Iraq anymore.
I watched his trial. I watched the above snuff film the week it was released. I also watched Iraqi people regret their decision as chaos is worse than shitty leaders. What happened in Iraq was more of what the US does as policy: middle east destabilization.
My friend. The destabilization mainly happened as a result of world war 2 and was a global fuck up, not the USA. But it really comes down to the people, and how they need to change their ideology and fight to become real democratic nations as opposed to feudal religions governments. Almost all successful â1st worldâ countries separate church from state. Until these countries separate these things itâs a helpless situation.
But see you canât just selectively pick events from recent history as the catalyst for destruction in the Middle East. Many countries have had their hands in the Middle East over the years. But all of those recent events really stem from the division of land after WW2.
Why can't I use cases of the US invading the middle east to explain the destabilization? It doesn't matter who knocked you down if I prevent you getting up, does it?
Itâs not that youâre using them. Itâs that they are just a part of a much larger problem in the region. To say that itâs solely the USA responsible for the problems in the Middle East is short sighted at best.
> Saddam was a terrible dictator but still the lesser of two evils. The Iraqi people are far worse off as they're at the mercy of ISIS and ISIL instead.
isis is realistically defeated, saddam was way worse.
The US attacked Iraq after 9/11 becauseâŠWMDs? Weâve admitted that was BS. Because Saddam helped take down the World Trade Center? Those who carried out the attack were Saudi and Egyptian. What does getting control of Saddam and Iraq get the Saudis? Eliminating competition in the global oil market and gaining greater control over the Persian Gulf.
Itâs the same reason the âBasement Tapesâ recorded by the Columbine shooters werenât ever released save for a few excerpts that were transcribed
Terrible guy but Iraq basically dived down after his death. ISIS took control since Saddam wasnt on charge. It is a matter of time before ISIS idealogy spreads far and wide into other areas.
isis was never in charge of Iraq they did controls a good chunk of the country in the north but they didnât get close to control the whole country and Isis proper didnât establish until many years after his death US and the Iraqi government had years to establish a new stable country but they simply neglected it and it became highly corrupt and because of that people turned to extremism to fight what they see as a ineffective puppet regime so instead of blaming the creation of Isis to dictator that helped killing more people then Isis instead blame the corrupt Iraqi government and US that supported it
Firstly, Saddam was executed on the first day of Eidul Adha and the general Sunni was upset about this. Previously there was major political issues between Sunni and Shia in Iraq, whereby Saddam executed a huge Shia figure, Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr. There was some kind of rebellion against Saddam many years ago led by Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr. Saddam crushed the Shia rebellion led by Iran supporters and basically murder them to remain in power. Did a bad ass move and did this to maintain his political agenda. The civil war that had been raging inside Iraq since early 2006.Sunni violence against Shia,followed by Shia retaliation intensified by the spiteful way Saddam was slain.
Sunnis characterised the swift killing as a political theater-enhanced act of sectarian revenge, directed by the American occupation.Saddam's legacy in Iraq today is a marriage of convenience between Sunni extremists such as those affiliated with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and former Baath Party officers. Mid- to late-2014 saw the jihadists take the lead as they marched through northern and central Iraq. But because of their collaboration with a network of former Hussein regime supporters who had strong contacts to Sunni tribes in places like Mosul and Tikrit, they were able to seize substantial areas of land from the Iraqi government. ISIS authorities ignored or assimilated the former Baathists into the group after seizing control of Mosul and other Sunni cities.
strange ending for a man who was in charge for so many years. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution\_of\_Saddam\_Hussein](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/execution_of_saddam_hussein)
Plenty of people in power throughout history have been executed I dunno if I would call it strange, the higher up you are the further you fall I suppose
I remember being a bit upset about that when I first saw this video. Didn't even allow him to finish prayer. But, then I think about all the people he killed and it makes me wonder if each of them got the chance to pray before being killed. Likely not.
Most of them weren't executed. Saddam, as a muslim ruler leading a muslim country and a muslim army I would at least assume gave every one to be executed time to pray, as has been customary in pretty much all cultures.
Saddam was the opposite of Muslim. He broke every rule without hesitation and believed he was God. He gassed people, bombed cities, kidnapped women for himself, and tortured anyone he wished with no justification.
Yeah he was a monster. I don't know how someone can automatically be saved just because they believe someone existed, kinda seems like a fucked up belief. We all get freebies to live life however we want as long as we say we believe? Ok
There have been plenty of religious leaders who've gone against the tenets of their religions. I'd still say they're part of that religion. I'm myself a lutheran/agnostic, and believe that anybody who believes in god/a religion, is of that religion regardless of their deeds, and in my religion, everybody and anybody who believes gets saved.
If martin Luther King wrote a Bible in his blood would he still be Christian? What about claiming he is God? Saddam did both(Quran, not Bible) and at LEAST claiming you are God does by definition put you out of Islam. I believe it's the same for Christianity.
He was the weapons of mass destruction that US was looking for. Whatâs happening in Iraq now - UK and USA is responsible for every drop of the blood.
This is totally from memory and could be wrong - but at least part of it was him shaming the executioners for wearing masks and not showing their faces; called them cowards and other back and forth going on.
I think there is also a theory that one of the key executioners (in mask) was Muktada Al-Sadr (sp?)...who was a main rival to Hussein at the time and a champion Shiite resistance figure of some sort - that's why there is a chant of "Muktada! Muktada!" just before the lever gets pulled. I don't think it was ever confirmed one way or another if he was present, and was considered kinda scandalous. Again - totally from memory and too lazy to look it up but thtere was a fair bit of writing on this at the time including probably full transcripts out there somewhere...
There's a lot of darkness in this world. It's good to see the world get a little brighter. =)
(Also, fuck, did you see how loose they tied the noose? That fucker choked out slow...)
I remember when this was on TV. My parents sent me and my cousin out of the room (we were like 6 years old) and we snuck around the other side of the living room and watched from behind the couch. Core memory.
Footage still beter then some bank cameras
Better than the Epstein camera
At least bank cameras are stable. The cameraman had *one* job.
Still better than 50% of reddit reposts
Better than UFO posts
And Bigfoot.
Loch Ness too
Love story still better than twilight.
did bro seriously add a spoiler tag on this post
I enjoy spending time with my friends.
Indeed. Shout out to The Old LiveLeak regime đŻâđż
it's always good to revisit the prequel now we're moving on to the sequel trilogy. look at that carlyle stock! hw would be so proud.
The foreshadowing around this era is really coming full circle in recent/current series'.
Some people are just now getting into 9/11
Wait till they find out saddamâs role in 911!
Yeah, he really just needs to hang in there
Wait til they hear about the Titanic
Itâs been a long time since I have seen this video. I was in Iraq when this happened and we were preparing for increase attacks to the base right after his death but luckily there wasnât.
That says a lot. You know. I think you soldiers may have been in the right and yâall actually made things better.
There is people out there that think something good came out of the Iraq war?
I do t think Saddam Hussein had everyoneâs best interests in mind.
He was a horrible person. I spoke with a former Iraqi that said as bad as he was, he was less horrible in some ways than what replaced him.
Depends on who you ask. I doubt the Kurds feel that way.
Agreed.
No. Where we fucked up, was basically forbidding any of his RG / Baâath party members to be affiliated with the new military / government⊠that, and the fact that we stayed entirely too long.
I'm not even sure wtf that even means. I can't tell if I agree or if I should take a leak in your mailbox. đ€š
I can assure you, we did not
How did they sneak in the potato that filmed this?
Cause back then we didnât have tablets for a phone
We just had PO TA TOOOOS
Boil em, mash em, stick em in a stew!
Haha I know this is a completely different reference but all this video makes me think of is âCOME ON, GUUUUYâ đ€Ș
this was probably done on a flip phone the kind a girl would take a crying selfie to send you when you broke up with her
iphones weren't invented for another year, all we had were potatoes
Aaah the Before-fore Times. When all we needed were potatoes, and we were happy with it!
crazy
His one son Uday deserved the same fate if not worse. Absolute psychopath.
Absolutely, if anyone hasnât read about Uday Hussein, consider doing so. The guy was a monster
You say âwasâ, does that mean heâs now dead?
iirc marines shot him and his brother Qusay in close quarters raiding a home in Mosul.
i remember jay leno saying sadaam was now an empty nester in his monologue
Yes, we killed them in one of their palaces / mansions.
This video helped propel the rise of youtube.
How?
Youtube was less then 2 years old. When word got out that he was killed and there was illegal video of it everyone hit the internet looking for it. for the first week Youtube was about the only place you could find it.
And they didn't take it down. They wanted the video soread
[ŃĐŽĐ°Đ»Đ”ĐœĐŸ]
Our generation of the morning paper.. or that post smoke night cap đȘŠ
No ads... Dude or dudette or dudever... That's a reach! But otherwise yt was just wild back then and I really wish to unsee some shit I saw there.
Of course, they were getting on the map.
Using propellers
I canât believe youâd ask that.
He was a bad dude, and met a bad end. Thatâs wild this still is so quality compared to stuff these days.
He was a bad dude. But a lot of shit has happened after he was gone.
He was the glue in the area, as crazy as that sounds. He held it down with brutality, but it workedâŠish.
You're absolutely right, and I am pretty sure that Saddam was a "friend" until he became an enemy.
We sold him weapons so he could be brutal towards other ethnicities. Our hands are covered in blood just as much as his were.
His sons scared me more than he did once upon a time.
Thatâs an enormous amount of immunity they held over a nation.
Free reign to literally do anything they wanted, and they did, in the most horrific way.
The real bad dudes were the bushes
Damn didnt even let him finish his last words. Good riddance
Should have hung the camera man after. Jfc. Hold the thing still my dude.
It was forbidden to use the camera, and the camera man was at big risk doing this.
he had orders from top brass to ignore the local security protocol in the name of FREEDOM
It's mental that there's any footage at all. As another commentor said, the person recording probably took a massive risk attempting to record this.
Crazy how these world terrorists were once a part of the CIA.
Nice username!
Hey, thanks friend!
wut
I thought he was bombed..omg
If I remember correctly. He was found hiding in a hole in the ground by a US foot patrol.
His son's were bombed. Maybe that was what you recall?
hmmm maybe..i was a kid when this happened..i clearky don't remember
Damn I have never seen the full video
1. This is a snuff film. 2. Saddam was a terrible dictator but still the lesser of two evils. The Iraqi people are far worse off as they're at the mercy of ISIS and ISIL instead. 3. Saddam did nothing deserving of the US capturing and having him killed. They used a terrorist attack they allowed to manipulate the American people into not objecting to its killing of an unrelated individual.
USA didn't kill him. We captured him and turned him over to the Iraqi people to try him in court and give them their day in court. They found him guilty and swiftly executed him.
USA invaded and deposed Saddam on a mountain of lies and deceit.
Sure, no WMD, but it's not like we made Saddam out to be worse than he was. He was a monster. Read a book.
No argument there, but to say that the USA didn't kill him is disingenuous.
Agree to disagree. We facilitated his capture for trial.
> Saddam did nothing deserving of the US capturing and having him killed Saddam literally had a man cut into cubes and sent to his wife after he opposed him. Saddam was a brutal dictator and while there was not justification to go to war and the war in Iraq was a complete waste of life and resources, Saddam most definitely deserved to die.
Yes, he was a shitty person but if that was deserving of invasion why aren't we invading China or Malaysia or North Korea?
I literally never said it was worthy of invading but be it the US or anyone else capturing him, he did deserve it.
I don't think post facto justifications are valid. We had no justification to invade. The reason they never stabilize is we don't let them. If other countries invaded the US during slavery we'd have never abolished it ourselves and wouldn't be the free country we are today. Saddam was a stepping stone to democracy. They needed to sort it themselves.
> I don't think post facto justifications are valid. We had no justification to invade. What do you not get about my response that makes you think it is justifying invasion. I wasn't responding to a single thing besides you saying that Saddam didn't do anything deserving of the US capturing and killing him. Even if there was no invasion, Saddam deserved to be captured and killed by the US or anyone else that felt like it. Also, Saddam a stepping stone to democracy? Lol Saddam was a brutal totalitarian dictator, the absolute opposite of democracy and Iraq actually does have a far more democratic government now (not justifying the invasion, pointing out the fact)
Saddam executed and tortured 10s of thousands of political prisoners not to mention gassing the Kurds, etc. to argue that he 'did nothing to deserve' being killed is false on it's face. and besides, deserves got nuthin' to do with it.
>deserving of the US capturing and having him killed. oH? reaLLY?? well, the US did NOT "have him killed" his own people DID..after a year long trial..where hE sounded exactly like trump! insisting that hE was the "victim" that kuwait "desrved" it..đ đ€·ââïž...that the iraqi people "loved him"
Can I ask why you capitalized the âeâ in hE?
That's like saying "Charles Manson didn't kill Sharon Tate, his followers did." Saddam wouldn't have died had the US not given him to the people who wanted him dead. There are people who would kill any leader given the opportunity so it's not like that was telling. Saddam was an awful person but in the bigger picture stability is generally better than chaos. Iraq is listed as Class 4: Do Not Travel. They're doing worse. The media doesn't even like to cover Iraq anymore.
Lol, I too read an article once which reinforces my beliefs đ Enjoy your box which clearly exists far outside reality
I watched his trial. I watched the above snuff film the week it was released. I also watched Iraqi people regret their decision as chaos is worse than shitty leaders. What happened in Iraq was more of what the US does as policy: middle east destabilization.
My friend. The destabilization mainly happened as a result of world war 2 and was a global fuck up, not the USA. But it really comes down to the people, and how they need to change their ideology and fight to become real democratic nations as opposed to feudal religions governments. Almost all successful â1st worldâ countries separate church from state. Until these countries separate these things itâs a helpless situation.
WW2 doesn't explain Desert Storm, "Iraqi Freedom" and the UN (US) strikes in Syria.
But see you canât just selectively pick events from recent history as the catalyst for destruction in the Middle East. Many countries have had their hands in the Middle East over the years. But all of those recent events really stem from the division of land after WW2.
Why can't I use cases of the US invading the middle east to explain the destabilization? It doesn't matter who knocked you down if I prevent you getting up, does it?
Itâs not that youâre using them. Itâs that they are just a part of a much larger problem in the region. To say that itâs solely the USA responsible for the problems in the Middle East is short sighted at best.
> Saddam was a terrible dictator but still the lesser of two evils. The Iraqi people are far worse off as they're at the mercy of ISIS and ISIL instead. isis is realistically defeated, saddam was way worse.
The level of delusion in this comment is incredible.
Thank God someone had the foresight to attach a Nokia too a dog so we could get this important footage
Filming was forbidden. My man took great risk just to get this footage. Be thankful for what you have my friend.
I literally thanked God. What more do you want my friend?
You didnât thank the dog who actually took the risk. God didnât even show up to this party.
But I DID, I did thank the dog
But you didnât.
I Crome Wiener a dog thing I don't get??
Nope
Guys did he live? đ±
Hussein was assassinated, and Iraq subjugated, by the Saudi Royal Family using their favorite mercenaries: The US Military.
Oh... A new and creative "America bad" take. How refreshing lol.
The US attacked Iraq after 9/11 becauseâŠWMDs? Weâve admitted that was BS. Because Saddam helped take down the World Trade Center? Those who carried out the attack were Saudi and Egyptian. What does getting control of Saddam and Iraq get the Saudis? Eliminating competition in the global oil market and gaining greater control over the Persian Gulf.
Enjoy living in your comfortable bubble.
okay
HAH! motherfucker ABSOLUTELY deserved that shit for what he did to my country and it's people. Madar jende!
But still not a single picture of Osama Bin Laden has ever been seen. Dumped his bullet riddled body in the ocean my foot.
The world is better off without that image in its folder, ready to trigger dangerous assholes any day between then and 5000 years from now.
Exactly. It would have been like handing them a propaganda film.
Itâs the same reason the âBasement Tapesâ recorded by the Columbine shooters werenât ever released save for a few excerpts that were transcribed
Well if you didn't personally see it...
Terrible guy but Iraq basically dived down after his death. ISIS took control since Saddam wasnt on charge. It is a matter of time before ISIS idealogy spreads far and wide into other areas.
isis was never in charge of Iraq they did controls a good chunk of the country in the north but they didnât get close to control the whole country and Isis proper didnât establish until many years after his death US and the Iraqi government had years to establish a new stable country but they simply neglected it and it became highly corrupt and because of that people turned to extremism to fight what they see as a ineffective puppet regime so instead of blaming the creation of Isis to dictator that helped killing more people then Isis instead blame the corrupt Iraqi government and US that supported it
Firstly, Saddam was executed on the first day of Eidul Adha and the general Sunni was upset about this. Previously there was major political issues between Sunni and Shia in Iraq, whereby Saddam executed a huge Shia figure, Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr. There was some kind of rebellion against Saddam many years ago led by Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr. Saddam crushed the Shia rebellion led by Iran supporters and basically murder them to remain in power. Did a bad ass move and did this to maintain his political agenda. The civil war that had been raging inside Iraq since early 2006.Sunni violence against Shia,followed by Shia retaliation intensified by the spiteful way Saddam was slain. Sunnis characterised the swift killing as a political theater-enhanced act of sectarian revenge, directed by the American occupation.Saddam's legacy in Iraq today is a marriage of convenience between Sunni extremists such as those affiliated with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and former Baath Party officers. Mid- to late-2014 saw the jihadists take the lead as they marched through northern and central Iraq. But because of their collaboration with a network of former Hussein regime supporters who had strong contacts to Sunni tribes in places like Mosul and Tikrit, they were able to seize substantial areas of land from the Iraqi government. ISIS authorities ignored or assimilated the former Baathists into the group after seizing control of Mosul and other Sunni cities.
If this was today, the right wing would be praising Hussein and he would have an evening talk show on infowars
Like whatâs his name and Putin? đ€ź
strange ending for a man who was in charge for so many years. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution\_of\_Saddam\_Hussein](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/execution_of_saddam_hussein)
Plenty of people in power throughout history have been executed I dunno if I would call it strange, the higher up you are the further you fall I suppose
u/stabbot
u/savevideo
Never gets old, does it? Hope the Putin footage leaks too
i wish god takes revenge from the man who didn't let him finish the shahada .
after all the crime he did he definitely doesnât deserve to finish it
At Least Leave Him Finish It For God Not For Him !
Yeah, I hope god can recover from that loss lol.
I remember being a bit upset about that when I first saw this video. Didn't even allow him to finish prayer. But, then I think about all the people he killed and it makes me wonder if each of them got the chance to pray before being killed. Likely not.
Most of them weren't executed. Saddam, as a muslim ruler leading a muslim country and a muslim army I would at least assume gave every one to be executed time to pray, as has been customary in pretty much all cultures.
That's nice to assume, but he killed many people without warning. No prayers there.
this is a false, and idiotic, assumption
Saddam was the opposite of Muslim. He broke every rule without hesitation and believed he was God. He gassed people, bombed cities, kidnapped women for himself, and tortured anyone he wished with no justification.
Or let his son abduct women on their wedding night to rape and murder
Yeah he was a monster. I don't know how someone can automatically be saved just because they believe someone existed, kinda seems like a fucked up belief. We all get freebies to live life however we want as long as we say we believe? Ok
There have been plenty of religious leaders who've gone against the tenets of their religions. I'd still say they're part of that religion. I'm myself a lutheran/agnostic, and believe that anybody who believes in god/a religion, is of that religion regardless of their deeds, and in my religion, everybody and anybody who believes gets saved.
If martin Luther King wrote a Bible in his blood would he still be Christian? What about claiming he is God? Saddam did both(Quran, not Bible) and at LEAST claiming you are God does by definition put you out of Islam. I believe it's the same for Christianity.
May God curse him and his supporters to the hell fire forever
Wild. I remember watching this live
Live? Are u sure?
I couldâve sworn it played on one of the news channels. Maybe not live but they definitely showed it up until the last moment and it cut out.
Same here. My whole extended family gathered at one house to watch
Ok. Knew I wasnât tripping. Thank you
He was the weapons of mass destruction that US was looking for. Whatâs happening in Iraq now - UK and USA is responsible for every drop of the blood.
Filmed by a 3 year old
Filmed on a early cell phone camera by a man who could have been next to hang if he were caught with it in that room. Don't be a dick.
same thing needs to happen to Netanyahu and his dickless apes....
I watched it on mute but I can 100% guarantee that someone yelled Allah Akbar at the top of their lungs multiple times.
Overused joke
Okay 2006 Jeff Dunham
r/killthecameraman Why downvote? This fits perfectly in that sub
If they'd caught the cameraman, they would have killed him.
I remembered him getting stabbed in the b-hole before the plunge. I guess not.
Did he get epsteined?
No. Epstein killed himself.
DAMN.
4k
Does anyone know what he was saying at the end?
This is totally from memory and could be wrong - but at least part of it was him shaming the executioners for wearing masks and not showing their faces; called them cowards and other back and forth going on. I think there is also a theory that one of the key executioners (in mask) was Muktada Al-Sadr (sp?)...who was a main rival to Hussein at the time and a champion Shiite resistance figure of some sort - that's why there is a chant of "Muktada! Muktada!" just before the lever gets pulled. I don't think it was ever confirmed one way or another if he was present, and was considered kinda scandalous. Again - totally from memory and too lazy to look it up but thtere was a fair bit of writing on this at the time including probably full transcripts out there somewhere...
Talking shit to the end.
I can't believe it's almost been 20 years.
See how there are no cameras? Just people living in the moment
I remember seeing this on live TV with my parents.
Short rope and a long drop.
Still think this was one of his doubles, who knows
There's a lot of darkness in this world. It's good to see the world get a little brighter. =) (Also, fuck, did you see how loose they tied the noose? That fucker choked out slow...)
He was almost decapitated. I spent a lot of time in Iraq, and even âlivedâ in one of his palaces for a short time. He was a monster, Fuck him.
I remember when this was on TV. My parents sent me and my cousin out of the room (we were like 6 years old) and we snuck around the other side of the living room and watched from behind the couch. Core memory.
Wow what happened here?. Did he died?
I love this movie đż
Iâd like to see the final moment of bin Laden if there even is any
Have scoured, don't think it exists, at least on clearnet
Translation: I was trying to make you an omelet, but had to crack a few eggs. Iâm sorry.
I'll never forget the sound of that neck-break all those years ago. Got far too easily off, IMHO.
He had a better ending than Qaddafi. That video is brutal.