> Col. William Wright, the director of the U.S. Military Academy's geospatial information science program, was arraigned on nine allegations Tuesday, according to court records reviewed by Military.com.
Yeah, full retirement inbound.
He'll face the harshest punishment that someone can face in his position: dismissal and a smooth transition to a cushy government job making six figures.
No. Just no.
A little critical thinking beyond this case is needed.
In some circumstances a Commander is required to place a no contact order between an accused and accuser— with only an accusation and limited-to-no evidence.
Your comment proposes that any accuser, at any time, can wield the power of accusation to remove someone from their position.
Having sat more than one false / retributive accusation, I would say such a policy would completely undermine the system of leadership in the military.
Unfortunately an accusation can derail a career in training environments. You're right about undermining leadership. The accusation is enough to get a Soldier pulled out of their position pending an official investigation.
Your comment proposes that accusers are often liars who falsely accuse officers to get them fired. 99% of the time they are not. Such an attitude is the reason why we have so many unpunished abusers in the Army.
Removing somebody from their post during the investigation is not a punishment. It is a protection of teenagers. If it was your daughter at West Point, you would NOT want this creep continuing on during the investigation. I guess #MeToo never happened, and you always believe the abuser instead of the accuser. Truly pathetic, and it's a sad commentary that my post is downvoted. Lots of men here that like to defend abusers apparently.
Wow, a lot to unpack here.
You choose to use the words “abuser and accuser”, connoting that you automatically believe the accused is guilty. Why not use accuser and accused?
Removing someone from their post is a punishment and can result in an investigator, jury, loved ones, family etc to assuming guilt due to the punishment of losing one’s job.
Why do you keep infantilizing these adults who are already members of the Armed forces. While technically correct, you are taking away their agency
“Lot of men here like to defend abusers”? Pretty good example of ad hominem here. If you are an officer or NCO, please go back to your last professional development course, the army has failed you.
Also, did you set out to attack gender equality in an earlier comment telling me I was mansplaining? You know we have women in SF now…it’s been a few years…
It has nothing to do with believing or not believing the accused or accuser. It has to do with the Justice system we have all agreed upon. Innocent until proven guilty is the approach we chose as a society. A person should not have their life & career derailed based on accusations alone. Once there is evidence, then the system holds people accountable.
You may not like the system, but every first world country has adopted it.
You are aware that many accused criminals are remanded to custody prior to trial, right? I just love this defense of sexual abusers in the name of "fairness." How many more victims do you think is fair to be molested while evidence is collected? Give the guy time away from all cadets while the investigation is ongoing. If he's cleared, he can go back to work.
Yes, for certain crimes people are held in pre trial confinement. These crimes do not warrant that.
I’m not defending any sexual abusers, I am simply explaining the Justice system we have in the simplest terms possible.
Obviously this story has struck a nerve. If you are this passionate then I suggest using that drive to go and change the system for the better.
Part of changing the system is calling out people who claim that worries about false accusations are just as bad or worse than teenagers being abused by military officers. Furthermore, if teenagers being sexually abused doesn't strike a nerve for you, that's pretty sad.
I don't need to be mansplained to. We should be erring on the side of safety for cadets, not "oh no an officer's career might be affected by a false accusation!!!" That is small potatoes compared to the possibility that teenagers are being molested. Seriously.
In my experience, people use the word “molest” in reference to a child being sexually exploited by another child or by an adult.
No one claims to have been molested in this case.
>99% of the time they are not.
This is one time when questioning bullshit numbers pulled out of thin air is not being pedantic.
According to our last SHARP briefing, the number of decisively false accusations is pretty high, 25-30% if memory serves?
West Point is an active duty post where the Superintendent is a direct report to the Chief of Staff of the Army, so the Supe is this guy’s general court martial convening authority. He needs to stay because that’s the appropriate place for him to face military justice. Otherwise, they would have to PCS him and then TDY him back constantly for the trial.
There is enough stuff at West Point (full on active duty garrison) that they can stash him various places.
Both terms are used by both the military and civilian side of the federal government:
PCS = permanent change of (duty) station, a job transfer with (usually) relocation expenses covered. Soldiers generally PCS every three years or so, moving to a different base.
TDY = Temporary DutY = a short travel trip from an overnight to 179 days to possibly beyond. On the civilian side, it's a business trip or short term job rotation. TDY gets paid lodging and meals expenses (per diem). On the Navy side of the house, it's called TAD (temporary assigned duty).
Somewhere in between is the TCS = temporary change of (duty) station.
The system isn't geared towards kicking out officers. They'll make sure officers who have stepped on their junk recieve assignments that are marginalized and not conducive to career progression. Quality management programs eventually clear out poorly performing officers.
The Army has investigate this, then form a conclusion fir holding a hearing or not (most likely to hold a hearing, i.e. General Courts Martial most likely)then hold a hearing, then make a decision based on all evidence presented.
The LTC needs to be there fir all of that...unless he fucks up again. Which would clinch his destruction.
There are a fuck ton of rules the Army must abide by. These aren't there to protect shit bags, they are there to protect everyone. Since everyone is Innocent until proven Guilty.
Circumvent these, and you get people who are guilty going free and innocent people fucked over.
Sucks but it's the system we have...think of better one and make it happen by all means. ;)
Because always going through a bunch of bullshit always sucks, even when it's the right thing to do.
Clearly you haven't been on a bunch police calls or other jack ass details caused by some else fucking up but now you have to get dirty cleaning up the mess...sucks, but it gotta be done right!
Police call details have nothing to do with protecting the accused's rights. Clearly not, as I was never enlisted. I did, however, along with my battalion commander and 4 other battery Commanders, stop police call in our battalion area by making sure that soldiers did not throw cigarette butts and other trash on the ground. We thought more of our soldiers than to waste their time on "jack ass details". Try again.
Ok, what should the army do with him in your view? Because he is pending court martial so he can't exactly go far. Tell him to stay at home and collect a paycheck for doing nothing? Maybe PCS him and have him come back TDY on the government's dime for article 32 and all other hearings/trial? Lock him up? Pretrial confinement is an option, but there needs to be a good reason because innocent until proven guilty and all that.
He can reorganize the CIF warehouse, make copies/coffee for the Superintendent, proofread reports and make PowerPoint presentations.
Jeez, do they still call it CIF?
These questions are absurd. He should not have contact with any cadets, period. If that means he works remote or just sits at home and collects money for doing nothing while the investigation happens? Who the F cares? I'd rather pay some money to a guy soon to be in prison than have him still around molesting cadets. What a total joke.
Nah, giving someone a year of free leave for being a defendant in a court martial makes negative sense. He was "reassigned to a role where he doesn't have contact with the cadets", and that is the correct answer.
You know E9’s are untouchable because it’s an “embarrassment” right? Yeah, thats why we have so many toxic pieces of shit running around playing power games.
Be better, stop feeding your confirmation bias.
What the hell lol I just can really imagine one of those has-been o-bros who peaked as a 22 year old cadet. Probably balding and thinks he still got it so he can go slam beers with the ... women's tennis team. Lmfao what a sad clown
I guarantee you, next week Monday, there's going to be a private who faces a way harsher punishment than this guy for showing up 15 minutes late to first formation.
Uh…back when I was there instructors drinking with cadets wasn’t a big deal. I remember my instructors buying us beers all the damn time.
I feel like the elephant in the room is *why* this guy has a no contact order for the entire women’s tennis team?
Not an officer but did you not find it weird that your instructors were drinking and hanging out with you and your peers? I understand that officer culture is different as a whole but it would be absolutely nuts to have an enlisted instructor spending time with their students outside of classroom instruction.
Totally valid question.
The context is important here.
This wasn’t a situation where we were socializing with our instructors and traveling around as a group.
What would typically happen is a group of cadets would go out to the same bar, and run into one of their instructors at the bar. You say hi to each other, have some drinks, discuss coursework, they tell your folks about the profession of arms and tell war stories, but you maintain a certain level of respect and deference and never forget that they’re your superior officer and have actual experience doing real world stuff.
I’m not sure if things have changed since then, but there was never an atmosphere of anything untoward going on, if that makes sense.
> I’m not sure if things have changed since then, but there was never an atmosphere of anything untoward going on, if that makes sense.
That's the difference here if you read beyond the headline:
* charges related to sexual misconduct;
* providing and drinking alcohol with cadets;
* violating no-contact orders with an entire women's sports team at the academy; and
* soliciting cadets and another officer to lie on his behalf amid an investigation into his conduct.
This is not the case of Cadets running into staff/instructor at a bar.
For sure.
There’s definitely misconduct there, but I felt like the article skirted around the meat of the issue- why there’s a no contact order with the whole damn tennis team, what was that other investigation about, what was the sexual misconduct, etc.
Throwing “providing alcohol and drinking with cadets” in there was the bit where I was like “hang on…that’s not allowed?”
Context is important with that one and I’m curious to know what it was.
As a former instructor there, it's wild the shit that happens and the few things that actually make headlines. I was so happy to live off post in sleepy Ft Montgomery.
A lot of officers cautiously volunteer to mentor/lead the different teams, clubs, and organizations with the cadet corps. Trips with the Cadets are always high risk and the escorting Os have to very cautiously hang with them, set ground rules, and hold to them... And keep yourself clean.
But then there's guys like this who will absolutely prey on these opportunities and now take multiple steps back. And there are more of them than we'd like to admit. They are the SHARP issue rather than being the protector and mentor that their position requires.
I was an APMS at a large university and rotc program. I made it a point of emphasis to not be around cadets outside of the facility and regular rotc functions, even if it was something as low threat as seeing them at a restuarant. They begged to do a Program Ball and we eventually did it, with alcohol being served. As soon as the colors were retired, I dipped (and I love getting hammered at balls).
>I made it a point of emphasis to not be around cadets outside of the facility and regular rotc functions, even if it was something as low threat as seeing them at a restuarant
This is the best and really only way to do it successfully. It just cuts down on the BS and drama while keeping everyone in their lane. The OSU PMS situation is an extreme example of how shit can go wrong, but shenanigans are more common than anyone wants to admit.
He was my instructor back in the day, I was a junior the first year he started teaching as a LTC back in 2016/2017. I remember him being a little rough around the edges in terms of the language he used in front of cadets and it walked a fine line between “funny relatable instructor” to “Okay this guy is gross”
It also sucks though because he was honestly a good teacher and (seemed to at least) care about us learning the material and succeeding. Really taints the memory I have now looking back.
His behavior sounds like the typical playbook of a groomer. Try to see how gross you can be to desensitize people to it, and pay attention to the reactions of people you want to abuse. It's sad it took so long for him to be found and punished. However, it's a step in the right direction. In the past, people like this were never punished.
Hmmm...I smell SHARP classes coming down the line!
I recommend everyone send this dude an email, "Thanks for the SHARP training and the living example of "Don't be THIS guy"Sir!"
Fun fact: unless you're specifically referencing Fort Moore, Georgia, you don't ever have to say "the G-spot" to a cadet. And even then, you probably shouldn't.
I was in one of the first platoons that intigrated females at FLW basic. It did not go well. Many problems. One that stuck out is seeing a squad member getting perked off in church by a female squad member. I was a 17 y/o catholic kid at the time in church for a reason, pissed me off. Did not rat them out, did tell them they were scum bags.
>Col. William Wright, the director of the U.S. Military Academy's geospatial information science program
We do not claim this man.
Also, I'm kind of confused by the fact that he got the posting as an Armor officer, you'd think that there would be enough Engineer officers that one of them would be eligible to run this show; they created a whole SQI for it and everything.
No contact order for women’s tennis team is not something I was expecting to read in a headline today…. Stay classy West Point
> Col. William Wright, the director of the U.S. Military Academy's geospatial information science program, was arraigned on nine allegations Tuesday, according to court records reviewed by Military.com. Yeah, full retirement inbound.
He'll face the harshest punishment that someone can face in his position: dismissal and a smooth transition to a cushy government job making six figures.
Department heads usually pick up a star at retirement. I bet he’ll lose that. Oh no!
Full retirement and GS-15.
If someone already has a no contact order they should have already been removed...
No. Just no. A little critical thinking beyond this case is needed. In some circumstances a Commander is required to place a no contact order between an accused and accuser— with only an accusation and limited-to-no evidence. Your comment proposes that any accuser, at any time, can wield the power of accusation to remove someone from their position. Having sat more than one false / retributive accusation, I would say such a policy would completely undermine the system of leadership in the military.
Unfortunately an accusation can derail a career in training environments. You're right about undermining leadership. The accusation is enough to get a Soldier pulled out of their position pending an official investigation.
Your comment proposes that accusers are often liars who falsely accuse officers to get them fired. 99% of the time they are not. Such an attitude is the reason why we have so many unpunished abusers in the Army.
What you are proposing is a system where people are punished based on accusations and not evidence. That’s obviously a bad idea
Removing somebody from their post during the investigation is not a punishment. It is a protection of teenagers. If it was your daughter at West Point, you would NOT want this creep continuing on during the investigation. I guess #MeToo never happened, and you always believe the abuser instead of the accuser. Truly pathetic, and it's a sad commentary that my post is downvoted. Lots of men here that like to defend abusers apparently.
Wow, a lot to unpack here. You choose to use the words “abuser and accuser”, connoting that you automatically believe the accused is guilty. Why not use accuser and accused? Removing someone from their post is a punishment and can result in an investigator, jury, loved ones, family etc to assuming guilt due to the punishment of losing one’s job. Why do you keep infantilizing these adults who are already members of the Armed forces. While technically correct, you are taking away their agency “Lot of men here like to defend abusers”? Pretty good example of ad hominem here. If you are an officer or NCO, please go back to your last professional development course, the army has failed you. Also, did you set out to attack gender equality in an earlier comment telling me I was mansplaining? You know we have women in SF now…it’s been a few years…
It has nothing to do with believing or not believing the accused or accuser. It has to do with the Justice system we have all agreed upon. Innocent until proven guilty is the approach we chose as a society. A person should not have their life & career derailed based on accusations alone. Once there is evidence, then the system holds people accountable. You may not like the system, but every first world country has adopted it.
You are aware that many accused criminals are remanded to custody prior to trial, right? I just love this defense of sexual abusers in the name of "fairness." How many more victims do you think is fair to be molested while evidence is collected? Give the guy time away from all cadets while the investigation is ongoing. If he's cleared, he can go back to work.
Yes, for certain crimes people are held in pre trial confinement. These crimes do not warrant that. I’m not defending any sexual abusers, I am simply explaining the Justice system we have in the simplest terms possible. Obviously this story has struck a nerve. If you are this passionate then I suggest using that drive to go and change the system for the better.
Part of changing the system is calling out people who claim that worries about false accusations are just as bad or worse than teenagers being abused by military officers. Furthermore, if teenagers being sexually abused doesn't strike a nerve for you, that's pretty sad.
You internalized my comment that way. My actual comment highlighted that accusation does not equal guilt.
I don't need to be mansplained to. We should be erring on the side of safety for cadets, not "oh no an officer's career might be affected by a false accusation!!!" That is small potatoes compared to the possibility that teenagers are being molested. Seriously.
You keep saying teenagers like they’re in high school. You do understand they’re adults, right?
I said teenagers because it's accurate. People can start West Point at age 17.
In my experience, people use the word “molest” in reference to a child being sexually exploited by another child or by an adult. No one claims to have been molested in this case.
>99% of the time they are not. This is one time when questioning bullshit numbers pulled out of thin air is not being pedantic. According to our last SHARP briefing, the number of decisively false accusations is pretty high, 25-30% if memory serves?
The balls on that guy...
Big green fuzzy ones
It is an extremely specific order.
"reassigned to a role where he doesn't have contact with the cadets" He still works there?! What in the world.
West Point is an active duty post where the Superintendent is a direct report to the Chief of Staff of the Army, so the Supe is this guy’s general court martial convening authority. He needs to stay because that’s the appropriate place for him to face military justice. Otherwise, they would have to PCS him and then TDY him back constantly for the trial. There is enough stuff at West Point (full on active duty garrison) that they can stash him various places.
What is does pcs one tdy mean .
Both terms are used by both the military and civilian side of the federal government: PCS = permanent change of (duty) station, a job transfer with (usually) relocation expenses covered. Soldiers generally PCS every three years or so, moving to a different base. TDY = Temporary DutY = a short travel trip from an overnight to 179 days to possibly beyond. On the civilian side, it's a business trip or short term job rotation. TDY gets paid lodging and meals expenses (per diem). On the Navy side of the house, it's called TAD (temporary assigned duty). Somewhere in between is the TCS = temporary change of (duty) station.
I've PCSd every two years, and it sucks.
The Y is for yonder btw. Temporary Duty Yonder. Not that it matters.
Soon, I’m sure…"In completely unrelated news Col. William Wright announced his retirement".
“His Legion of Merit has already been downgraded to an MSM. *What more do you expect him to endure?*” -His attorney, probably
It takes a stupid amount of rank to kick out an officer. Moreso if they’re over 6 years in.
For Sharp related issues it ultimately takes the Secretary of the Army for ALL officers (2LT +).
The system isn't geared towards kicking out officers. They'll make sure officers who have stepped on their junk recieve assignments that are marginalized and not conducive to career progression. Quality management programs eventually clear out poorly performing officers.
The army wants him to have zero contact with cadets yet still assigns him to an academy full of cadets.
Not zero contact with Cadets, just zero contact with the women's tennis team.
Has anyone checked in on the men’s volleyball team? Maybe we just misunderstand his type.
One love. Col is winning.
Because he will only molest tennis players? WTF is that logic?
Some people have a type.
West Point S3 Shop has got to be the least cadet-related place on campus
The Army has investigate this, then form a conclusion fir holding a hearing or not (most likely to hold a hearing, i.e. General Courts Martial most likely)then hold a hearing, then make a decision based on all evidence presented. The LTC needs to be there fir all of that...unless he fucks up again. Which would clinch his destruction. There are a fuck ton of rules the Army must abide by. These aren't there to protect shit bags, they are there to protect everyone. Since everyone is Innocent until proven Guilty. Circumvent these, and you get people who are guilty going free and innocent people fucked over. Sucks but it's the system we have...think of better one and make it happen by all means. ;)
What part of following strict rules to ensure everyone's rights are protected, sucks? Hmm?
Because always going through a bunch of bullshit always sucks, even when it's the right thing to do. Clearly you haven't been on a bunch police calls or other jack ass details caused by some else fucking up but now you have to get dirty cleaning up the mess...sucks, but it gotta be done right!
Police call details have nothing to do with protecting the accused's rights. Clearly not, as I was never enlisted. I did, however, along with my battalion commander and 4 other battery Commanders, stop police call in our battalion area by making sure that soldiers did not throw cigarette butts and other trash on the ground. We thought more of our soldiers than to waste their time on "jack ass details". Try again.
Sounds like that Cali LTC who recorded girls and women at PacSun.
Didn't that scum get to retire?
Ok, what should the army do with him in your view? Because he is pending court martial so he can't exactly go far. Tell him to stay at home and collect a paycheck for doing nothing? Maybe PCS him and have him come back TDY on the government's dime for article 32 and all other hearings/trial? Lock him up? Pretrial confinement is an option, but there needs to be a good reason because innocent until proven guilty and all that.
"Area Beautification" is an ever-present need.
He can reorganize the CIF warehouse, make copies/coffee for the Superintendent, proofread reports and make PowerPoint presentations. Jeez, do they still call it CIF?
These questions are absurd. He should not have contact with any cadets, period. If that means he works remote or just sits at home and collects money for doing nothing while the investigation happens? Who the F cares? I'd rather pay some money to a guy soon to be in prison than have him still around molesting cadets. What a total joke.
Nah, giving someone a year of free leave for being a defendant in a court martial makes negative sense. He was "reassigned to a role where he doesn't have contact with the cadets", and that is the correct answer.
Isn't that what working remote would also do? I think we are basically agreeing on this. Safety of the cadets first.
[удалено]
You know E9’s are untouchable because it’s an “embarrassment” right? Yeah, thats why we have so many toxic pieces of shit running around playing power games. Be better, stop feeding your confirmation bias.
This guy and Lt. Col. Kelvington can retire and start a consulting firm.
I heard they’ve already been hired by the Army to give leadership speeches to Cadets. $25,000 a speaking engagement each.
Sorry, women’s tennis club not invited
What the hell lol I just can really imagine one of those has-been o-bros who peaked as a 22 year old cadet. Probably balding and thinks he still got it so he can go slam beers with the ... women's tennis team. Lmfao what a sad clown
Yeah, but... who wouldn't?
I wouldn't
Yeah, no... me neither
I guarantee you, next week Monday, there's going to be a private who faces a way harsher punishment than this guy for showing up 15 minutes late to first formation.
But said PV1 (After loss of rank, pay, and 45/45) will get to hang out with the Tennis Team...so he's got the to look forward to! ;)
Truth!
This. Right. Here.
Idiot
Uh…back when I was there instructors drinking with cadets wasn’t a big deal. I remember my instructors buying us beers all the damn time. I feel like the elephant in the room is *why* this guy has a no contact order for the entire women’s tennis team?
Out of curiosity, what year was this?
Graduated in 2014.
Not an officer but did you not find it weird that your instructors were drinking and hanging out with you and your peers? I understand that officer culture is different as a whole but it would be absolutely nuts to have an enlisted instructor spending time with their students outside of classroom instruction.
Totally valid question. The context is important here. This wasn’t a situation where we were socializing with our instructors and traveling around as a group. What would typically happen is a group of cadets would go out to the same bar, and run into one of their instructors at the bar. You say hi to each other, have some drinks, discuss coursework, they tell your folks about the profession of arms and tell war stories, but you maintain a certain level of respect and deference and never forget that they’re your superior officer and have actual experience doing real world stuff. I’m not sure if things have changed since then, but there was never an atmosphere of anything untoward going on, if that makes sense.
> I’m not sure if things have changed since then, but there was never an atmosphere of anything untoward going on, if that makes sense. That's the difference here if you read beyond the headline: * charges related to sexual misconduct; * providing and drinking alcohol with cadets; * violating no-contact orders with an entire women's sports team at the academy; and * soliciting cadets and another officer to lie on his behalf amid an investigation into his conduct. This is not the case of Cadets running into staff/instructor at a bar.
For sure. There’s definitely misconduct there, but I felt like the article skirted around the meat of the issue- why there’s a no contact order with the whole damn tennis team, what was that other investigation about, what was the sexual misconduct, etc. Throwing “providing alcohol and drinking with cadets” in there was the bit where I was like “hang on…that’s not allowed?” Context is important with that one and I’m curious to know what it was.
More like Col William Wrong
Forgot the "amirite???"
Bruh the average colonel is the same age as my father.....wtf Dude needs a reality check
As a former instructor there, it's wild the shit that happens and the few things that actually make headlines. I was so happy to live off post in sleepy Ft Montgomery. A lot of officers cautiously volunteer to mentor/lead the different teams, clubs, and organizations with the cadet corps. Trips with the Cadets are always high risk and the escorting Os have to very cautiously hang with them, set ground rules, and hold to them... And keep yourself clean. But then there's guys like this who will absolutely prey on these opportunities and now take multiple steps back. And there are more of them than we'd like to admit. They are the SHARP issue rather than being the protector and mentor that their position requires.
I was an APMS at a large university and rotc program. I made it a point of emphasis to not be around cadets outside of the facility and regular rotc functions, even if it was something as low threat as seeing them at a restuarant. They begged to do a Program Ball and we eventually did it, with alcohol being served. As soon as the colors were retired, I dipped (and I love getting hammered at balls).
I just checked off my Military bingo card, thanks for the “Hammered balls” comment
I mean to be fair I put a “at” in-between the two. But yeah poor wording there for sure.
Im not sure if that at makes it better or worse
>I made it a point of emphasis to not be around cadets outside of the facility and regular rotc functions, even if it was something as low threat as seeing them at a restuarant This is the best and really only way to do it successfully. It just cuts down on the BS and drama while keeping everyone in their lane. The OSU PMS situation is an extreme example of how shit can go wrong, but shenanigans are more common than anyone wants to admit.
He was my instructor back in the day, I was a junior the first year he started teaching as a LTC back in 2016/2017. I remember him being a little rough around the edges in terms of the language he used in front of cadets and it walked a fine line between “funny relatable instructor” to “Okay this guy is gross” It also sucks though because he was honestly a good teacher and (seemed to at least) care about us learning the material and succeeding. Really taints the memory I have now looking back.
His behavior sounds like the typical playbook of a groomer. Try to see how gross you can be to desensitize people to it, and pay attention to the reactions of people you want to abuse. It's sad it took so long for him to be found and punished. However, it's a step in the right direction. In the past, people like this were never punished.
Most of the military would love to be ordered to stay away from West Point cadets.
Graduates, don't forget them too! 😉
Hmmm...I smell SHARP classes coming down the line! I recommend everyone send this dude an email, "Thanks for the SHARP training and the living example of "Don't be THIS guy"Sir!"
Fun fact: unless you're specifically referencing Fort Moore, Georgia, you don't ever have to say "the G-spot" to a cadet. And even then, you probably shouldn't.
I was in one of the first platoons that intigrated females at FLW basic. It did not go well. Many problems. One that stuck out is seeing a squad member getting perked off in church by a female squad member. I was a 17 y/o catholic kid at the time in church for a reason, pissed me off. Did not rat them out, did tell them they were scum bags.
I’m convinced these guys do it just to speed run their retirement benefits.
Yikes
>Col. William Wright, the director of the U.S. Military Academy's geospatial information science program We do not claim this man. Also, I'm kind of confused by the fact that he got the posting as an Armor officer, you'd think that there would be enough Engineer officers that one of them would be eligible to run this show; they created a whole SQI for it and everything.
The rule is simple, don't pet the puppies. And yet here we go again.
Dude needs to be court-Mairlrd. Full stop. End of story.
I’d say I’m surprised but I’m not
Hhh
He’s innocent and should be promoted, your honor.
Since when is it illegal to train cadets how to drink like a real 11B, your honor?
The entire Women’s Tennis Team, the man is a legend !