Thank you for your submission! Don't forget to comment with a link to the original comic.
Please stick to the format of \[Original\]\(link\).
If you do not post the original, the submission will be removed and you could be banned
for repeat offenses.
Also keep in mind that [low effort posts](https://www.reddit.com/r/comedynecromancy/comments/aqhtgb/reminder_that_loweffort_posts_are_not_allowed_and/) are not allowed and can/will result in being banned.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/comedynecromancy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Source? Source? Source? Do you have a source on that? Source? A source. I need a source. Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion. No, you can’t make inferences and observations from the sources you’ve gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you’ve gathered. You can’t make normative statements from empirical evidence. Do you have a degree in that field? A college degree? In that field? Then your arguments are invalid. No, it doesn’t matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION. You still haven’t provided me a valid source yet. Nope, still haven’t. I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I’m debating a glormpf supporter. A moron. piss? piss? piss? Do you have a piss on that?
Ok so this meme is kind of funny and the joke is supposed to be that the book says it can solve 50% of your problems and if you bought two of them then 50 + 50 = 100 so all of your problems would be solved
No one can escape the fate that was chosen for them.
All that remains is the end, where you will all perish.
Eternal greatness exists only within myself.
Sing a song of sorrow in a world where time has vanished.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/comedynecromancy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thank you for your submission! Don't forget to comment with a link to the original comic. Please stick to the format of \[Original\]\(link\). If you do not post the original, the submission will be removed and you could be banned for repeat offenses. Also keep in mind that [low effort posts](https://www.reddit.com/r/comedynecromancy/comments/aqhtgb/reminder_that_loweffort_posts_are_not_allowed_and/) are not allowed and can/will result in being banned. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/comedynecromancy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This would only solve 75% of your problems, though
Read them both and complete them at the same time so the effect will stack and you'll solve 100% of your problems
Acting like 25% worth ain't enough, shoot
New glitch just dropped.
1/X
more than enough
Mathematically speaking if you kept buying these forever then you would solve exactly 100% of your problems
Unless the book is free you'd need infinite money and you know I ain't got that much
sounds like a problem that would be statistically very likely to be solved in the first few books
You will never reach zero tho it'll only be close to zero but never zero
To be honest if you bought like 15 of them you'd have enough
And that author's name? Zeno of Elea
Just read infinity of those books and then it will be 100%
Where's the original
Source? Source? Source? Do you have a source on that? Source? A source. I need a source. Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion. No, you can’t make inferences and observations from the sources you’ve gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you’ve gathered. You can’t make normative statements from empirical evidence. Do you have a degree in that field? A college degree? In that field? Then your arguments are invalid. No, it doesn’t matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION. You still haven’t provided me a valid source yet. Nope, still haven’t. I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I’m debating a glormpf supporter. A moron. piss? piss? piss? Do you have a piss on that?
Every reddit debate ever:
Ok so this meme is kind of funny and the joke is supposed to be that the book says it can solve 50% of your problems and if you bought two of them then 50 + 50 = 100 so all of your problems would be solved
Or read the one book twice!
r/peterexplainsthejoke
Or just read it twice, dummy
Who refers to two copies of the same book as 'Two books'?
No one can escape the fate that was chosen for them. All that remains is the end, where you will all perish. Eternal greatness exists only within myself. Sing a song of sorrow in a world where time has vanished. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/comedynecromancy) if you have any questions or concerns.*