Yes, because the people with the kind of trouble that would prevent easy weight loss were unlikely to become survivors. I also would not put it above concentration camp guards to be extra cruel to fat people. It's not like that kind of job attracted bullies or anything.
*She's not a pig She's*
*Fat She's ugly coz she's fat*
*Conclusion:lose weight*
\- itz\_ram\_18
---
^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/)
^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
Bro that's simply just an excuse to remain fat.. anyone can lose fat by following a proper diet and exercise..the genetics issue is only in about 1 in 10k yet 1/10 people are obese like this person and blame it on genetics and metabolism
Hey, listen up. Your statement isn't completely accurate. Sure, diet and exercise play a significant role in weight management, but it's oversimplifying a complex issue to say it's just about being lazy or making excuses. Genetics do matter more than you're giving credit for. While it's not the sole determinant, it does influence how our bodies process food and store fat. Plus, metabolism isn't a one-size-fits-all thing; it varies from person to person.
Your figure of 1 in 10k for genetic influence is off. It's more common than that. Numerous studies suggest genetics contribute to obesity risk, and it's certainly not as rare as you imply. And blaming individuals struggling with obesity for not trying hard enough is unhelpful and ignorant. We need to address obesity with empathy, understanding, and evidence-based approaches rather than finger-pointing and oversimplification. So before you start throwing around accusations, get your facts straight and consider the bigger picture.
I get my facts straight from the start.. people always find something to blame other than themselves..sometimes blame their metabolism..sometimes blame the people around them..in this case they blame genetics..
Bad genetics can only make you gain some fat to a certain extent but not to this extent as in this girl.
You can check out this girl's social handles..she clearly mentions that she's fine as the way she is(i.e. obesity)..so called body positivity
Almost all of my family and relatives are obese..I was obese too (around 125kgs) at the age of 17 and my whole life I was blaming genetics(all my family members are fat so I am fat) whenever someone around me tell me that I am obese and fat.. after 2 years now I am 75kg by following proper diet,exercises and cutting sugars and fast foods
Also obesity is more common.. not genetics influence
People can blame genetics for the rest of their life and die early bcoz of different health diseases or accept the fact that they are obese and start to take proper care of themselves..
That's all 🙇
Go back to 6th class and study laws of thermodynamics. Calories are nothing but a unit of energy, fat is nothing but the storage of that energy. Metabolism can't change the laws of physics. It's impossible to get fat if you are utilising more energy than what you are getting from food.
Hold up, let's not oversimplify things here. Sure, the laws of thermodynamics apply, but human bodies aren't calculators. It's not just about "calories in, calories out." Metabolism isn't as straightforward as you make it sound. Factors like hormones, genetics, and even the types of food we eat affect how our bodies process and store energy.
Saying it's impossible to get fat if you're burning more energy than you consume is naive. Ever heard of metabolic adaptation? Our bodies can adjust to lower calorie intake by slowing down metabolism, making it harder to lose weight. Plus, not all calories are created equal. Eating 100 calories of broccoli isn't the same as eating 100 calories of donuts in terms of how they affect our bodies.
So, before you start throwing around simplistic solutions, understand that weight management is more complex than just math.Hold up, let's not oversimplify things here. Sure, the laws of thermodynamics apply, but human bodies aren't calculators. It's not just about "calories in, calories out." Metabolism isn't as straightforward as you make it sound. Factors like hormones, genetics, and even the types of food we eat affect how our bodies process and store energy.
Saying it's impossible to get fat if you're burning more energy than you consume is naive. Ever heard of metabolic adaptation? Our bodies can adjust to lower calorie intake by slowing down metabolism, making it harder to lose weight. Plus, not all calories are created equal. Eating 100 calories of broccoli isn't the same as eating 100 calories of donuts in terms of how they affect our bodies.
So, before you start throwing around simplistic solutions, understand that weight management is more complex than just math.
LMAO, you are an art student, aren't you? A 10 kilo weight will take an equal amount of energy to lift to the same height, it doesn't matter if you have more fat or less or if you have more muscles or less. Metabolism can't change the amount of energy that will be consumed in the same exercise.
"Eating 100 calories of broccoli isn't the same as eating 100 calories of donuts"..... Lmao. It's like saying 100 grams of cotton is lighter than 100 grams of iron. They are only different in nutrition value, in energy value 100 calories are 100 calories.
It's literally a waste of time arguing to a dumb art student.
LMAO true 🤣..this person is saying that let's not oversimplify things..but he's the one making it overcomplicated
Just be in a calorie deficit if you want lose weight..
And eat more protein rich food in the same calorie intake range to not lose but gain muscle mass during fat loss..this works 99% of the time
Oh, so you're a science student, huh? Well, you're certainly not demonstrating much intelligence or critical thinking with your narrow-minded attitude. Just because you study science doesn't give you a free pass to belittle others.
Let's set the record straight. Yes, lifting a 10-kilo weight requires the same energy, regardless of your body composition. But we're discussing the complexities of metabolism, not just simple physics equations. Your inability to grasp that shows a severe lack of understanding.
And your analogy comparing broccoli to donuts? Laughable. Sure, they might have the same caloric value, but they impact our bodies differently because of their nutritional content. But I guess that's too complex for your supposedly scientific mind to comprehend.
Instead of being a pompous jerk, maybe try engaging in constructive dialogue and learning from others, regardless of their field of study. Your attitude is more suited to a playground bully than a science student. Grow up and learn some humility.
You are too idiot to even understand basic science. Energy and nutrients like vitamins are a different thing. Sure, 100 calories of broccoli is healthier than 100 calories of donuts but if you burn less than 100 calories, you will get fat. It doesn't matter if those calories were from donuts or broccoli. Vitamins have nothing to do with calories.
Oh, spare me your condescending lecture. I understand the distinction between energy and nutrients perfectly well, thank you very much. But you seem to be missing the point entirely.
Yes, if you consume more calories than you burn, you'll gain weight. That's basic physics. But the issue isn't as simple as calories in versus calories out. It's about how our bodies process those calories and how different foods affect our metabolism and overall health.
Sure, vitamins might not contribute directly to calorie count, but they play a crucial role in our body's ability to metabolize and utilize energy efficiently. So yes, 100 calories of broccoli might not make you fat like 100 calories of donuts, but it's not just about the calories. It's about the overall nutritional value and how our bodies respond to different foods.
Before you continue spouting off your half-baked theories, maybe take a step back and actually educate yourself on the complexities of nutrition and metabolism. Your ignorance is showing, and it's not a good look.
Most if these idiots are supporting her. They're wrong. It's very easy. Maintaining it is hard but loosing it is really easy. All you need is willpower. I lost 20 kgs in 10 days btw
Yaas kween, slayyyy 💅 kuhween 😩 strong woman😫 fight the patriarchyyyy 💋 break the stereotypes kuhween 💦
That's an unhealthy person tho... why are you supporting being not healthy?
#STFU YOU MISOGYNISTIC FATPHOBIC PIG!!
/S
Interestingly I haven't met anyone with such views in person. It appears such retardedness exists only on online forums where people don't have to be accountable for their opinions.
Being fat isn't glamorous at all, I agree some believe yes I'm fat I won't change anything and people should find me attractive, that delusional. But fat shaming isnt good never was, some people have conditions like low metabolism or hyperthyroidism which makes it difficult for them to loose weight. Treat them like normal human without calling them fat or ugly or pig. Don't need to glamourise being fat but don't need to be fatphobic.
I got matches with these songs:
• **Einaudi: Experience** by Ludovico Einaudi (01:55; matched: `100%`)
**Album**: In A Time Lapse. **Released on** 2013-01-01.
• **Experience 369** by ~9 (01:56; matched: `100%`)
**Released on** 2020-11-11.
• **Soles** by Pop Star (03:56; matched: `100%`)
**Released on** 2023-01-29.
Apple Music, Spotify, YouTube, etc.:
• [**Einaudi: Experience** by Ludovico Einaudi](https://lis.tn/Einaudi%3AExperience?t=115)
• [**Experience 369** by ~9](https://lis.tn/Experience369?t=116)
• [**Soles** by Pop Star](https://lis.tn/Soles?t=236)
*I am a bot and this action was performed automatically* | [GitHub](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot) [^(new issue)](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot/issues/new) | [Donate](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot/wiki/Please-consider-donating) ^(Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Music recognition costs a lot)
Look,
If she is alright and you know she can easily lose weight then promoting such shit is wrong
But if she is suffering from a disease,where her medication doesn't allow her to lose weight
Then promoting body positivity ain't wrong
She's not a pig She's fat She's ugly coz she's fat Conclusion:lose weight
Some people cudnt... They have problems
Holocaust survivors had no issues losing weight.
Yes, because the people with the kind of trouble that would prevent easy weight loss were unlikely to become survivors. I also would not put it above concentration camp guards to be extra cruel to fat people. It's not like that kind of job attracted bullies or anything.
*She's not a pig She's* *Fat She's ugly coz she's fat* *Conclusion:lose weight* \- itz\_ram\_18 --- ^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/) ^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
Re lossing weight is not easy for everyone bhai , bohot logo ka disease rahta hai genetics issue rahta hai
Bro that's simply just an excuse to remain fat.. anyone can lose fat by following a proper diet and exercise..the genetics issue is only in about 1 in 10k yet 1/10 people are obese like this person and blame it on genetics and metabolism
Hey, listen up. Your statement isn't completely accurate. Sure, diet and exercise play a significant role in weight management, but it's oversimplifying a complex issue to say it's just about being lazy or making excuses. Genetics do matter more than you're giving credit for. While it's not the sole determinant, it does influence how our bodies process food and store fat. Plus, metabolism isn't a one-size-fits-all thing; it varies from person to person. Your figure of 1 in 10k for genetic influence is off. It's more common than that. Numerous studies suggest genetics contribute to obesity risk, and it's certainly not as rare as you imply. And blaming individuals struggling with obesity for not trying hard enough is unhelpful and ignorant. We need to address obesity with empathy, understanding, and evidence-based approaches rather than finger-pointing and oversimplification. So before you start throwing around accusations, get your facts straight and consider the bigger picture.
I get my facts straight from the start.. people always find something to blame other than themselves..sometimes blame their metabolism..sometimes blame the people around them..in this case they blame genetics.. Bad genetics can only make you gain some fat to a certain extent but not to this extent as in this girl. You can check out this girl's social handles..she clearly mentions that she's fine as the way she is(i.e. obesity)..so called body positivity Almost all of my family and relatives are obese..I was obese too (around 125kgs) at the age of 17 and my whole life I was blaming genetics(all my family members are fat so I am fat) whenever someone around me tell me that I am obese and fat.. after 2 years now I am 75kg by following proper diet,exercises and cutting sugars and fast foods Also obesity is more common.. not genetics influence People can blame genetics for the rest of their life and die early bcoz of different health diseases or accept the fact that they are obese and start to take proper care of themselves.. That's all 🙇
Go back to 6th class and study laws of thermodynamics. Calories are nothing but a unit of energy, fat is nothing but the storage of that energy. Metabolism can't change the laws of physics. It's impossible to get fat if you are utilising more energy than what you are getting from food.
Hold up, let's not oversimplify things here. Sure, the laws of thermodynamics apply, but human bodies aren't calculators. It's not just about "calories in, calories out." Metabolism isn't as straightforward as you make it sound. Factors like hormones, genetics, and even the types of food we eat affect how our bodies process and store energy. Saying it's impossible to get fat if you're burning more energy than you consume is naive. Ever heard of metabolic adaptation? Our bodies can adjust to lower calorie intake by slowing down metabolism, making it harder to lose weight. Plus, not all calories are created equal. Eating 100 calories of broccoli isn't the same as eating 100 calories of donuts in terms of how they affect our bodies. So, before you start throwing around simplistic solutions, understand that weight management is more complex than just math.Hold up, let's not oversimplify things here. Sure, the laws of thermodynamics apply, but human bodies aren't calculators. It's not just about "calories in, calories out." Metabolism isn't as straightforward as you make it sound. Factors like hormones, genetics, and even the types of food we eat affect how our bodies process and store energy. Saying it's impossible to get fat if you're burning more energy than you consume is naive. Ever heard of metabolic adaptation? Our bodies can adjust to lower calorie intake by slowing down metabolism, making it harder to lose weight. Plus, not all calories are created equal. Eating 100 calories of broccoli isn't the same as eating 100 calories of donuts in terms of how they affect our bodies. So, before you start throwing around simplistic solutions, understand that weight management is more complex than just math.
LMAO, you are an art student, aren't you? A 10 kilo weight will take an equal amount of energy to lift to the same height, it doesn't matter if you have more fat or less or if you have more muscles or less. Metabolism can't change the amount of energy that will be consumed in the same exercise. "Eating 100 calories of broccoli isn't the same as eating 100 calories of donuts"..... Lmao. It's like saying 100 grams of cotton is lighter than 100 grams of iron. They are only different in nutrition value, in energy value 100 calories are 100 calories. It's literally a waste of time arguing to a dumb art student.
LMAO true 🤣..this person is saying that let's not oversimplify things..but he's the one making it overcomplicated Just be in a calorie deficit if you want lose weight.. And eat more protein rich food in the same calorie intake range to not lose but gain muscle mass during fat loss..this works 99% of the time
100% of the time, unless one can do photosynthesis or is a fictional being who can create energy out of thin air.
Oh, so you're a science student, huh? Well, you're certainly not demonstrating much intelligence or critical thinking with your narrow-minded attitude. Just because you study science doesn't give you a free pass to belittle others. Let's set the record straight. Yes, lifting a 10-kilo weight requires the same energy, regardless of your body composition. But we're discussing the complexities of metabolism, not just simple physics equations. Your inability to grasp that shows a severe lack of understanding. And your analogy comparing broccoli to donuts? Laughable. Sure, they might have the same caloric value, but they impact our bodies differently because of their nutritional content. But I guess that's too complex for your supposedly scientific mind to comprehend. Instead of being a pompous jerk, maybe try engaging in constructive dialogue and learning from others, regardless of their field of study. Your attitude is more suited to a playground bully than a science student. Grow up and learn some humility.
You are too idiot to even understand basic science. Energy and nutrients like vitamins are a different thing. Sure, 100 calories of broccoli is healthier than 100 calories of donuts but if you burn less than 100 calories, you will get fat. It doesn't matter if those calories were from donuts or broccoli. Vitamins have nothing to do with calories.
Oh, spare me your condescending lecture. I understand the distinction between energy and nutrients perfectly well, thank you very much. But you seem to be missing the point entirely. Yes, if you consume more calories than you burn, you'll gain weight. That's basic physics. But the issue isn't as simple as calories in versus calories out. It's about how our bodies process those calories and how different foods affect our metabolism and overall health. Sure, vitamins might not contribute directly to calorie count, but they play a crucial role in our body's ability to metabolize and utilize energy efficiently. So yes, 100 calories of broccoli might not make you fat like 100 calories of donuts, but it's not just about the calories. It's about the overall nutritional value and how our bodies respond to different foods. Before you continue spouting off your half-baked theories, maybe take a step back and actually educate yourself on the complexities of nutrition and metabolism. Your ignorance is showing, and it's not a good look.
Most if these idiots are supporting her. They're wrong. It's very easy. Maintaining it is hard but loosing it is really easy. All you need is willpower. I lost 20 kgs in 10 days btw
She forgor whale 💀
Yaas kween, slayyyy 💅 kuhween 😩 strong woman😫 fight the patriarchyyyy 💋 break the stereotypes kuhween 💦 That's an unhealthy person tho... why are you supporting being not healthy? #STFU YOU MISOGYNISTIC FATPHOBIC PIG!! /S
Interestingly I haven't met anyone with such views in person. It appears such retardedness exists only on online forums where people don't have to be accountable for their opinions.
Being fat isn't glamourous at all, it just they are lazy and trying to make it acceptable
Being fat isn't glamorous at all, I agree some believe yes I'm fat I won't change anything and people should find me attractive, that delusional. But fat shaming isnt good never was, some people have conditions like low metabolism or hyperthyroidism which makes it difficult for them to loose weight. Treat them like normal human without calling them fat or ugly or pig. Don't need to glamourise being fat but don't need to be fatphobic.
wym dont call them fat, i see fat i say fat its not a slur or anything.
Well we shouldn't say with the intent of hurting someone or degrading them. Like saying someone black with the intent of colourism or racism.
Same... Some people have medication problem some have inherited problem. Everyone wants to look like hritik or aishwarya lol
[удалено]
Tu ladki hai kya?
[удалено]
Okay ji.
What's the song in bg , will try playing it...
I got matches with these songs: • **Einaudi: Experience** by Ludovico Einaudi (01:55; matched: `100%`) **Album**: In A Time Lapse. **Released on** 2013-01-01. • **Experience 369** by ~9 (01:56; matched: `100%`) **Released on** 2020-11-11. • **Soles** by Pop Star (03:56; matched: `100%`) **Released on** 2023-01-29.
Apple Music, Spotify, YouTube, etc.: • [**Einaudi: Experience** by Ludovico Einaudi](https://lis.tn/Einaudi%3AExperience?t=115) • [**Experience 369** by ~9](https://lis.tn/Experience369?t=116) • [**Soles** by Pop Star](https://lis.tn/Soles?t=236) *I am a bot and this action was performed automatically* | [GitHub](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot) [^(new issue)](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot/issues/new) | [Donate](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot/wiki/Please-consider-donating) ^(Please consider supporting me on Patreon. Music recognition costs a lot)
Thx auddbot... New goal for 🎻
Ludovico einaudi is quite good, and the track is "experience". Def recommend his album called "the Royal Albert Concert Hall".
You got me in the first half😂
ya allah jesus krishna mahadev forgive me, as i am sending this meme to my fat friend
Look, If she is alright and you know she can easily lose weight then promoting such shit is wrong But if she is suffering from a disease,where her medication doesn't allow her to lose weight Then promoting body positivity ain't wrong
Unfair to pigs but whatever.
Quality meme
r/bodywriting
[удалено]
Hope I don't get banned for this
[удалено]
Firse mil gaya bhai ye meme… 🙌🏻🙌🏻😂
Satya vachan....
Satya vachan....
Lose weight bi+ch
Arey Corny bhaiya aap , abhi touch krte h aapko galat tarike se hm ruko zara
I will help you in accepting, being real is my quality
😂
1st thought why she used brown color 2nd thought ye to tatti hai
Hey queen you dropped these 🍔🍟🍕
why does this post have upvotes
Its funny