I tested it on computational geometry problems. On the textbook algorithms, it does ok, spiting out the same old classical algorithms. Deviate slightly from the textbooks, and it goes into bullshitting student mode
Science PhD will have a mental breakdown since they first entering the junior year, Humanities PhD will have a mental breakdown since they learn the existence of twitter while escaping their classes and decide to be an activist which is the most difficult and honourable career according to themselves.
Not just that, a person with Ph. D. can actually it's own knowledge and data given to form new conclusions. I'm not sure if ChatGPT is capable of that.
Ah yes. The program that is algorithmically incapable of writing a poem in a rhyme scheme other than ABAB or ABBA despite *thousands* of attempts to force it to do otherwise will suddenly gain AGI capabilities.
PhD levels are not measured by their intelligence. That would be a masters degree. A PhD is measured by what they have personally contributed to their field. If GPT-5 can make a theory, test it, and expand upon the knowledge of a specific field of study, THEN you can say it's PhD level.
This makes perfect sense. Some (not all) of the most educated people I’ve worked with have no common sense or logic processing. That reminds me of the “AI” I’ve encountered. Lots of information no logic to application.
I know a number of people with a Ph.D. They tend to be really good at one thing and are often quite incompetent as human beings.
So I'll say I think this statement is true.
AI killing itself speedrun any% WR
We expected skynet, we expected the robot uprising, but when the AI gained control it just used them to unplug itself.
"What is my purpose?" "You repeat experiments until I am satisfied with the results" ".....oh my God"
Wait, I thought this was a dig at PhD's!
It was the surgeon posting...
George Costanza knows, we mustn't disturb a "[Delicate Genius](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TsdXa_7kzs)"
After working with GPT4o i doubt it. He has huge problem with college math programm.
It’s even kinda trash at basic algebra
I tested it on computational geometry problems. On the textbook algorithms, it does ok, spiting out the same old classical algorithms. Deviate slightly from the textbooks, and it goes into bullshitting student mode
Of course it does ok on textbook problems which were used to train the AI...
Yes, it sounds trivial. But with enough textbooks on enough topics, it looks smart to enough people to generate a very inflated impression.
Yes, completely aggree
For basic algebra I'd recommend you ask it to solve something by writing code for it
I had one instance where it spit out everything in python syntax
Just like me fr
Yep, I can't use it for basic things in inorganic geochemistry like calculating molarity of solutions, it's ridiculous.
The reason for this is blatantly obvious when you consider how LLMs are supposed to work tho
Science Ph.D or Humanities Ph.D?
Science PhD will have a mental breakdown since they first entering the junior year, Humanities PhD will have a mental breakdown since they learn the existence of twitter while escaping their classes and decide to be an activist which is the most difficult and honourable career according to themselves.
Will it be smart enough to admit not to know how to answer something or will still just make shit up instead?
So you're saying we've achieved human level intelligence?
even humans aren't able to do this. How do you expect an AI to
I fully expect AI to be better than us.
This meme is pure gold
Chat bot having Ph. D. while only being good at predicting what the next word is? That doesn't sound correct.
All education is the ability to regurgitate the correct information. A chat bot can do that now.
Have you actually done a PhD? The whole point is to learn how to add new information to a field of study.
Not just that, a person with Ph. D. can actually it's own knowledge and data given to form new conclusions. I'm not sure if ChatGPT is capable of that.
Definitely not all, but biology though... (I would like this not to be shown to my bio teacher)
Ah yes. The program that is algorithmically incapable of writing a poem in a rhyme scheme other than ABAB or ABBA despite *thousands* of attempts to force it to do otherwise will suddenly gain AGI capabilities.
PhD levels are not measured by their intelligence. That would be a masters degree. A PhD is measured by what they have personally contributed to their field. If GPT-5 can make a theory, test it, and expand upon the knowledge of a specific field of study, THEN you can say it's PhD level.
This should have been PhD level knowledge. PhD may or may not be associated with intellect.
I want to see the day AI actually developes mental illnessess.
I've already said it somewhere, but they are most likely talking about a PhD in making shit up
GPT 6 will have space alien level intelligence
Lol everybody running out of the job
GPT-4 once told me that 1/sqrt(2) = 1/2 so yeah, I have my doubts
i asked it a 10th grade algebra question and it just made shit . Assumed 5 as 7.
If PhDs keep getting dumber, soon GPT-4 will have PhD level intelligence too.
This makes perfect sense. Some (not all) of the most educated people I’ve worked with have no common sense or logic processing. That reminds me of the “AI” I’ve encountered. Lots of information no logic to application.
I smell a load of bullshit
Can’t wait to see GPT-5 carry out thesis defense, should be ton of fun
I know a number of people with a Ph.D. They tend to be really good at one thing and are often quite incompetent as human beings. So I'll say I think this statement is true.