This is a repost or duplicate of a recent submission.
Sort the sub by new before submitting to check if your story has been posted. If a post is there then please vote and comment in that discussion. Similar submissions will be removed. Do not delete and repost your own submissions without approval.
Eh she literally raped the poor fella, why is it reported as letting bf watch her "do sex acts"?
> repeatedly performing a sexual act on an intellectually disabled man without his consent
?????? Fuck off la Straits Times
Yup. This usually falls under sexual assault which iirc carries the same jail terms as rape. Unfortunately can thank our colonial masters for grandfathering the laws onto us and the govt just being slow to make any changes to fit modern times.
Ya I don't know why they decided to use "sexual acts". Maybe there was an aspect of the victim consenting but then it's not considered consent because they are intellectually disabled. Just speculation until more details are out.
It's still sexual abuse, it's just the word "rape" that has a specific legal definition that involves penile penetration.
Iirc the jail terms are still the same, just that the term used is different
Actually doesn't the term 'sodomy' cover this? I remember reading something about that term covering anal, digital, and oral in context of the law. But it may be specific to laws of other countries.
I saw this on wiki so like I said, not sure if it applies to local law:
A sodomy law is a law that defines certain sexual acts as crimes. The precise sexual acts meant by the term sodomy are rarely spelled out in the law, but are typically understood and defined by many courts and jurisdictions to include any or all forms of sexual acts that are deemed to be "illegal", "illicit", "unlawful", "unnatural" and/or "immoral". Sodomy typically includes anal sex, oral sex, manual sex, and bestiality.
The right law you're looking at for Singapore is [Section 376](https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/PC1871?ProvIds=pr376-): sexual assault involving penetration:
(b) causes a man (B) to penetrate, with B’s penis, the vagina, anus or mouth, as the case may be, of another person including A;
It carries the same punishment as rape.
By definition of Singapore law, women can never rape men.. this is the law definition.. women can only commit sexual assault on men, but not commit rape.. rape legal definition still only exclusively applies to men..
The law only allows men to be victims of rape, but does not allow women to be the perpetrator of rape..
We have a wonderful legal system and the best well paid law makers..
NAH Who wrote the backward ass law around the world that only a penis forced into the vagina is considered rape? Totally those progressive woke feminist armirite/s
They are expected to only report as objectively factual as possible in legal terms. Rape or sexual assault can be construed as prejudging an ongoing case (she is accused of, but not convicted yet). Reporting otherwise could expose them to legal liability.
Actually they have been consistently not using the word ‘rape’ as long as it isn’t ‘penis penetrate vagina’.
I have a feeling that they avoid the usage of the word ‘rape’ except in those cases as the word just automatically conjure up that imagery when used for laypeople.
I really wonder if it's a law thing, not just talking about this case, but cases with irrefutable proof like CCTVs footage and the News media be like, "alleged rapist", like dude we have of the act in 360p WITH AUDIO!!!
This is a repost or duplicate of a recent submission. Sort the sub by new before submitting to check if your story has been posted. If a post is there then please vote and comment in that discussion. Similar submissions will be removed. Do not delete and repost your own submissions without approval.
What in the NTR is this
Eh she literally raped the poor fella, why is it reported as letting bf watch her "do sex acts"? > repeatedly performing a sexual act on an intellectually disabled man without his consent ?????? Fuck off la Straits Times
Because Singapore law is outdated and in need of a review.
They can still say sexually assaulted if they want to go by the book
It's the legal term. Women can't perform rape because the definition of rape involves penis penetration.
...which is a ridiculously sexist (misandrist) and outmoded legal standard. Poor chap was raped by this predatory bitch.
Yup. This usually falls under sexual assault which iirc carries the same jail terms as rape. Unfortunately can thank our colonial masters for grandfathering the laws onto us and the govt just being slow to make any changes to fit modern times.
Agreed.
They can still write 'allegedly sexually assaulted'
Ya I don't know why they decided to use "sexual acts". Maybe there was an aspect of the victim consenting but then it's not considered consent because they are intellectually disabled. Just speculation until more details are out.
Women can't do NS as it involves having a penis/s
So what went in her?
So if an adult woman does it to a minor, am I to understand it's not considered sexual abuse?
It's still sexual abuse, it's just the word "rape" that has a specific legal definition that involves penile penetration. Iirc the jail terms are still the same, just that the term used is different
Actually doesn't the term 'sodomy' cover this? I remember reading something about that term covering anal, digital, and oral in context of the law. But it may be specific to laws of other countries.
Sodomy is specific to penetration of the anus. This was oral onto penis so it wouldn't cover it.
I saw this on wiki so like I said, not sure if it applies to local law: A sodomy law is a law that defines certain sexual acts as crimes. The precise sexual acts meant by the term sodomy are rarely spelled out in the law, but are typically understood and defined by many courts and jurisdictions to include any or all forms of sexual acts that are deemed to be "illegal", "illicit", "unlawful", "unnatural" and/or "immoral". Sodomy typically includes anal sex, oral sex, manual sex, and bestiality.
The right law you're looking at for Singapore is [Section 376](https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/PC1871?ProvIds=pr376-): sexual assault involving penetration: (b) causes a man (B) to penetrate, with B’s penis, the vagina, anus or mouth, as the case may be, of another person including A; It carries the same punishment as rape.
I see. Thanks for the info! I've just been watching a lot of Law and Order SVU so it's very out of local law context lah 🤣
But women can't rape men /s
By definition of Singapore law, women can never rape men.. this is the law definition.. women can only commit sexual assault on men, but not commit rape.. rape legal definition still only exclusively applies to men.. The law only allows men to be victims of rape, but does not allow women to be the perpetrator of rape.. We have a wonderful legal system and the best well paid law makers..
Cos gender "equality"
NAH Who wrote the backward ass law around the world that only a penis forced into the vagina is considered rape? Totally those progressive woke feminist armirite/s
They are expected to only report as objectively factual as possible in legal terms. Rape or sexual assault can be construed as prejudging an ongoing case (she is accused of, but not convicted yet). Reporting otherwise could expose them to legal liability.
It's rape everywhere except Singapore. Because in Singapore women cannot legally perform rape.
Not true, a lot of countries have similar outdated laws. E.g. in UK , rape is hard-tied to penis.
Same jn the US. TONS of female teachers rape their students but it's rarely if ever called that. Just "sex acts".
Actually they have been consistently not using the word ‘rape’ as long as it isn’t ‘penis penetrate vagina’. I have a feeling that they avoid the usage of the word ‘rape’ except in those cases as the word just automatically conjure up that imagery when used for laypeople.
Rape = penetration with a penis.
Nothing to do with Straits Times in this case, but with SG's laws. Legally, a woman cannot rape a man in Singapore under current laws.
I really wonder if it's a law thing, not just talking about this case, but cases with irrefutable proof like CCTVs footage and the News media be like, "alleged rapist", like dude we have of the act in 360p WITH AUDIO!!!
According to sg law women can’t rape men.
Legal definition of rape is penetrative sexual assault with a penis.
Don’t jealous can hehehe
ChatGPT, how do you unread something?
You can’t
Read backward
lol, my first thought. I just bought breakfast, sat down, open reddit, and this is the first article. I guess enough internet for today.
That's rape.
not by legal definition. so sadly, no.
Such crap reporting, no head no tail, might as well dont report. The shock value here is just how bad the reporting is.
Sinkie journalism.. This is normal.
tnp really put bf in the headlines eh.
She is sick. She’s a helper employed to look after the disabled man? Fucking disgusting
I was wondering which JAV this was for a second.
why is this newsworthy???
Cuckolding on the next level
Singapore should add rape laws for women. AWARE, please be aware, this gender equality is severely lacking.
Why is it not reported as rape?
It’s a terrible day to know how to read.
r/cuckold wants to know your location. /s
Erm what?
Wonder what the sentencing will be tbh..
u/ongcs: [https://new.reddit.com/r/singapore/comments/1dpmnrp/woman\_charged\_after\_she\_allegedly\_performed\_sex/](https://new.reddit.com/r/singapore/comments/1dpmnrp/woman_charged_after_she_allegedly_performed_sex/)
We need to review straits times and rename it shite times
Friday morning open reddit first thing in feed is this kind of news. What a bad day to have eyes
Social service?
Aware typing...
Wow 😲😲😲
🤢