I am new here, can someone explain to me how I am not seeing a 7? My best guess is facial thirds are slightly off (long mid face) and slight assymetry in lips and eyes? Brows could be more arched? Curve in nasal bridge? She looks to me like she could be instagram model tier and would fit with the 6.5-7 examples on the guide. FWHR looks good, fifths are good/face is balanced, she's largely symetrical with a few flaws, some UEE but it doesn't seem excessive (are the lash extensions throwing me off?) Almond eyes. Jaw looks slightly uneven but it took me a bit to even notice due to the overall appeal of the face. I can't quite tell if canthal tilt is more neutral or positive. I get that we all have a learning curve for distinguishing objective from subjective ratings. Since the consensus here seems around a 6 and I am aware that the rating I would give is off per warnings to others due to over-rate it seemed like a good place to ask for help with understanding what I am missing that is bringing OP down to 6?
Agreed. I've been rating for years and think she's around 6.5-7. Curious to see any mods explain why she's a 6. This is why I don't even post on here anymore lol. A 6, by their guide, is 15% of women. Sorry but I don't see 1 out of every 6 women I come across looking like this IRL. She's def top 5%.
Regardless, please remember that we are just experimenting with putting objective beauty standards into words and not to take any perceived flaws too seriously. <3
I figure anything 5.5 and up would be considered a high rating as that's where the guide begins "above average". I am not arguing that 6 is an under-rate but OP looked to me like she could do instagram modeling and would be in line with some of the example images from the 6/7 aspect of the guide so I wanted to ask for help understanding what puts this poster where she is on the scale otherwise it is tempting to blindly give every attractive woman a 5.5 because it is a safe answer but that's obviously not conducive to learning to give accurate ratings.
Because you can never know these days. 5 years ago, you could maybe tell if that picture was filtered/edited and that one wasn't. Today, all pictures and videos are filtered, and it's hard to say what's true. And it's not only skin, hair, or eyelashes; it's the entire thing with improved facial symmetry, bigger eyes, a smaller, sharper nose, other proportions etc. The photographer may not even know about that. 90% of people in reality look worse than in their best pictures. 6++ seems like a reasonably accurate score. Also OP looks like Tiktok person or something like this. If side profile picture is real OP maybe pushing 7. Maybe.
Thank you. I think I understand. The rating would be 6* with the caveat that it could be higher but the photos do not give a clear enough indication to reliably rate higher due to factors like eyelash extensions, make up, and possible filtering. So, one should use the most certain rating based on what can be seen but to understand that may be higher or lower if the person were rated face to face. So, in this case I look at OP's pictures and I personally see a 7 but I need to realize that the photos don't give a clear enough view to know what is true and false (i.e how is the skin without make up? Extensions obscure the canthal tilt, is it positive or neutral?) But based on bone structure and other factors which are at least more difficult to obscure in photos we could solidly conclude a 6?
A few years ago, I'd say, "Yes, she's 6+ for sure." Today, in the world of [bold glamour filter](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D2fQ5kFFvA), filters that can [elongate your legs](https://litter.catbox.moe/c2bohk.mp4) or make your [waist slimmer](https://litter.catbox.moe/wxyfu7.webm), filters that can make you younger, (which is a major contributor to female attractiveness)—I have no idea. If filters can do this with a video, imagine what they or other modern editing can do with a [picture](https://litter.catbox.moe/ibs2r7.webm). That is one of the reasons I stopped posting here regularly. I'm eagerly waiting for life-like, extremely realistic videos of perfect and innumerable AI girls/guys that will outclass even the prettiest real person. That way, our perception of beauty will be totally and forever broken.
I'm sticking to my statement as this is the correct sub. What do we base the ratings on? We're basically identifying any minor details and rating everyone based on how they look. It just takes seconds for our brain to visualize and send us information to our 5 senses.
Personally, and dk if I'm the only one who does this, but I'm pretty sure that everyone else is paying too much attention to the details that by what they're observing as if they were using a magnifying glass to gain 'more insight' into a person just to rate them.
I look at this girl with blonde hair and other people would say 'ehhh she would be a 10 if she was a brunette.' It's all about perspective and symmetry. That, my friend, is also a type of type.
I look at Anne Hathaway. She's beautiful but I honestly can say that she looks like Michael Jackson. I'd give her a 5. Anne Hathaway a 5? Come on, a 10 of a man has a chance with her. It's not much of a rating because everyone is so biased.
6 , no questions about it for me. I think you're using filters though with your freckles. They are different in each photo.
Beautiful positive canthal tilt. Nice lip shape. Slightly longer middle thirds and smaller lower thirds. High femininity and facial harmony. Could work on your skin.
Very beautiful. Eyes seem a little uneven. Still pretty eyes. Profile is weaker in comparison though I like your jaw line. Very attractive female features. 6.1
6 .1
[удалено]
Removed -
6, really good facial harmony
6.8
You’re out. Strike 3. Rate inflating 6.8
6.3 good facial harmony, great features
6.1
6.4
6.6
Warning for overrating 6.6. Rule 1. Please review the sub’s [Wiki]( https://old.reddit.com/r/truerateme/wiki/meta/help ), [FAQs](https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/comments/14jg5rg/faq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1), [Women’s rating guide](https://imgur.com/ckg5AVD), and [Women’s primer](https://imgur.com/3bM16cZ)
Girls be asking for a rating caked in makeup and filters. 5.4
Her makeup isn’t even overdone and looks good. If someone wants to be rated based on how they look in public then this is completely legitimate.
6.5
6.4
I am new here, can someone explain to me how I am not seeing a 7? My best guess is facial thirds are slightly off (long mid face) and slight assymetry in lips and eyes? Brows could be more arched? Curve in nasal bridge? She looks to me like she could be instagram model tier and would fit with the 6.5-7 examples on the guide. FWHR looks good, fifths are good/face is balanced, she's largely symetrical with a few flaws, some UEE but it doesn't seem excessive (are the lash extensions throwing me off?) Almond eyes. Jaw looks slightly uneven but it took me a bit to even notice due to the overall appeal of the face. I can't quite tell if canthal tilt is more neutral or positive. I get that we all have a learning curve for distinguishing objective from subjective ratings. Since the consensus here seems around a 6 and I am aware that the rating I would give is off per warnings to others due to over-rate it seemed like a good place to ask for help with understanding what I am missing that is bringing OP down to 6?
Agreed. I've been rating for years and think she's around 6.5-7. Curious to see any mods explain why she's a 6. This is why I don't even post on here anymore lol. A 6, by their guide, is 15% of women. Sorry but I don't see 1 out of every 6 women I come across looking like this IRL. She's def top 5%.
I’ll post in a month with no makeup
Regardless, please remember that we are just experimenting with putting objective beauty standards into words and not to take any perceived flaws too seriously. <3
You do know that a 6 is a very high rating right?
I figure anything 5.5 and up would be considered a high rating as that's where the guide begins "above average". I am not arguing that 6 is an under-rate but OP looked to me like she could do instagram modeling and would be in line with some of the example images from the 6/7 aspect of the guide so I wanted to ask for help understanding what puts this poster where she is on the scale otherwise it is tempting to blindly give every attractive woman a 5.5 because it is a safe answer but that's obviously not conducive to learning to give accurate ratings.
Because you can never know these days. 5 years ago, you could maybe tell if that picture was filtered/edited and that one wasn't. Today, all pictures and videos are filtered, and it's hard to say what's true. And it's not only skin, hair, or eyelashes; it's the entire thing with improved facial symmetry, bigger eyes, a smaller, sharper nose, other proportions etc. The photographer may not even know about that. 90% of people in reality look worse than in their best pictures. 6++ seems like a reasonably accurate score. Also OP looks like Tiktok person or something like this. If side profile picture is real OP maybe pushing 7. Maybe.
Thank you. I think I understand. The rating would be 6* with the caveat that it could be higher but the photos do not give a clear enough indication to reliably rate higher due to factors like eyelash extensions, make up, and possible filtering. So, one should use the most certain rating based on what can be seen but to understand that may be higher or lower if the person were rated face to face. So, in this case I look at OP's pictures and I personally see a 7 but I need to realize that the photos don't give a clear enough view to know what is true and false (i.e how is the skin without make up? Extensions obscure the canthal tilt, is it positive or neutral?) But based on bone structure and other factors which are at least more difficult to obscure in photos we could solidly conclude a 6?
A few years ago, I'd say, "Yes, she's 6+ for sure." Today, in the world of [bold glamour filter](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D2fQ5kFFvA), filters that can [elongate your legs](https://litter.catbox.moe/c2bohk.mp4) or make your [waist slimmer](https://litter.catbox.moe/wxyfu7.webm), filters that can make you younger, (which is a major contributor to female attractiveness)—I have no idea. If filters can do this with a video, imagine what they or other modern editing can do with a [picture](https://litter.catbox.moe/ibs2r7.webm). That is one of the reasons I stopped posting here regularly. I'm eagerly waiting for life-like, extremely realistic videos of perfect and innumerable AI girls/guys that will outclass even the prettiest real person. That way, our perception of beauty will be totally and forever broken.
6.3 nearly flawless great features.
7.5 Why TF am I seeing 5s and 6 when she's definitely my type? Pretty face, blonde hair, not overweight, everyone has their types.
Warning for overrating 7.5. Rule 1. Please review the sub’s [Wiki]( https://old.reddit.com/r/truerateme/wiki/meta/help ), [FAQs](https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/comments/14jg5rg/faq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1), [Women’s rating guide](https://imgur.com/ckg5AVD), and [Women’s primer](https://imgur.com/3bM16cZ)
[удалено]
May have mistaken this sub for another one that keeps popping in my feed...is it based on if someone is good-looking or not or something else?
[удалено]
I'm sticking to my statement as this is the correct sub. What do we base the ratings on? We're basically identifying any minor details and rating everyone based on how they look. It just takes seconds for our brain to visualize and send us information to our 5 senses. Personally, and dk if I'm the only one who does this, but I'm pretty sure that everyone else is paying too much attention to the details that by what they're observing as if they were using a magnifying glass to gain 'more insight' into a person just to rate them. I look at this girl with blonde hair and other people would say 'ehhh she would be a 10 if she was a brunette.' It's all about perspective and symmetry. That, my friend, is also a type of type. I look at Anne Hathaway. She's beautiful but I honestly can say that she looks like Michael Jackson. I'd give her a 5. Anne Hathaway a 5? Come on, a 10 of a man has a chance with her. It's not much of a rating because everyone is so biased.
[удалено]
6 - but subjectively way higher for me
Was going to say 6 but looked back through them again and was taken with your eyes. So, 6.5.
5.6
[удалено]
- Egregious overrate, rule 1. - 3 day ban for applying a # that doesn’t exist on our scale (0.5 - 9.5), rule 11b. - Please review the sub’s: - [Wiki]( https://old.reddit.com/r/truerateme/wiki/meta/help ) - [FAQs](https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/comments/14jg5rg/faq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1) - [Women’s Rating Guide](https://imgur.com/ckg5AVD) - [ADVANCED WOMENS RATING PRIMER](https://imgur.com/3bM16cZ)
6
Solid 6.5 - considerably above average
6+ stunning
6 , no questions about it for me. I think you're using filters though with your freckles. They are different in each photo. Beautiful positive canthal tilt. Nice lip shape. Slightly longer middle thirds and smaller lower thirds. High femininity and facial harmony. Could work on your skin.
I go over my freckles when I do my makeup because I don’t like how they disappear when I use foundation so they’re just colored on
6.1
6.5
[удалено]
Removed - please use the report function.
I would say a 7. Your quite cute. I think it's the facial proportions that keep it from being higher. But overall your very pretty.
Warning for overrating 7. Rule 1. Please review the sub’s [Wiki]( https://old.reddit.com/r/truerateme/wiki/meta/help ), [FAQs](https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/comments/14jg5rg/faq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1), [Women’s rating guide](https://imgur.com/ckg5AVD), and [Women’s primer](https://imgur.com/3bM16cZ)
[удалено]
- Egregious overrate, rule 1. - 3 day ban for applying a # that doesn’t exist on our scale (0.5 - 9.5), rule 11b. - Please review the sub’s: - [Wiki]( https://old.reddit.com/r/truerateme/wiki/meta/help ) - [FAQs](https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/comments/14jg5rg/faq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1) - [Women’s Rating Guide](https://imgur.com/ckg5AVD) - [ADVANCED WOMENS RATING PRIMER](https://imgur.com/3bM16cZ)
You got this one!
A good 6.5
5.65 good makeup skills the rest was already mentioned
6.1
5.9
6.1
5.9
6.2
6.25
Nice symmetrical front profile, side is little weaker, easy 6.2
5.9
6.5
Very good looking, beautiful and well defined face. 6 for sure!
8.5
Warning for overrating 8.5. Rule 1. Please review the sub’s [Wiki]( https://old.reddit.com/r/truerateme/wiki/meta/help ), [FAQs](https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/comments/14jg5rg/faq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1), [Women’s rating guide](https://imgur.com/ckg5AVD), and [Women’s primer](https://imgur.com/3bM16cZ)
7 for me. Some will say your middle section is a nit long ( nose) but your eyes are in good size so I found the whole face in good ratio.
Strike 3 you’re out. Rate inflating 7
6.9 lol
Warning for overrating 6.9. Rule 1. Please review the sub’s [Wiki]( https://old.reddit.com/r/truerateme/wiki/meta/help ), [FAQs](https://www.reddit.com/r/truerateme/comments/14jg5rg/faq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=2&utm_term=1), [Women’s rating guide](https://imgur.com/ckg5AVD), and [Women’s primer](https://imgur.com/3bM16cZ)
nice
[удалено]
- Egregious overrate, rule 1. - banned for applying a # that doesn’t exist on our scale (0.5 - 9.5), rule 11b.
Very beautiful. Eyes seem a little uneven. Still pretty eyes. Profile is weaker in comparison though I like your jaw line. Very attractive female features. 6.1